Undecidability of theories of Boolean algebras with selected ideals (Q1092889): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Aldo Ursini / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Aldo Ursini / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5596792 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Decidability of Second-Order Theories and Automata on Infinite Trees / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3964551 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5802110 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 12:46, 18 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Undecidability of theories of Boolean algebras with selected ideals
scientific article

    Statements

    Undecidability of theories of Boolean algebras with selected ideals (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1986
    0 references
    Main result: Let (A,I) be a countable Boolean algebra with a selected ideal I. Then the theory of (A,I) is decidable iff A is superatomic. To prove necessity, it is shown how to obtain in an atomless B, for any \(k\in \omega\) a formula \(\psi_ k(z)\), in the language of Boolean algebras with a selected ideal, and for any (infinite) set \(A\subseteq \omega\) an ideal \(I_ A\) of B, such that \((B,I_ A)\vDash \exists z \psi_ k(z)\) iff \(k\in A.\) As to sufficiency, it is shown that the theory of (A,I), when A is superatomic, is (recursively) axiomatizable. The main tool is the construction of three mappings \(r_ 1,r_ 2,r_ 3\) from A into \(\omega\cup \{\infty \}\) with the properties: i) For \(x\in A\), \(x\in I\) iff \(r_ 3(x)\leq 1\); ii) for \(x\in A\), there are x', x'' such that \(x=x'\vee x''\), \(x'\wedge x''=0\) and \(r_ 2(x')=r_ 2(x'')=0\); iii) each statement \(``r_ j(\ell_ A)=n_ j''\) \((j=1,2,3)\) is equivalent to a r.e. set of formulas. It is shown that if (A,I) and (A',I') are both atomic and satisfy i) and ii), then they are elementary equivalent iff \(r_ j(\ell_ A)=r_ j(\ell_{A'})\) for \(j=1,2,3\).
    0 references
    recursive axiomatizability
    0 references
    decidability
    0 references
    countable Boolean algebra
    0 references
    selected ideal
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers