On reconstructing separable reduced p-groups with a given socle (Q1101830): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On Shelah's compactness of cardinals / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5609457 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On universal locally finite groups / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: In singular cardinality, locally free algebras are free / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Uniformization principles / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A compactness theorem for singular cardinals, free algebras, Whitehead problem and transversals / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Incompactness in regular cardinals / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Classification theory and the number of non-isomorphic models / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Constructions of many complicated uncountable structures and Boolean algebras / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Proper forcing / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 16:59, 18 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On reconstructing separable reduced p-groups with a given socle
scientific article

    Statements

    On reconstructing separable reduced p-groups with a given socle (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1987
    0 references
    Assuming G.C.H. the author proves the following interesting theorem. Suppose G is a pure subgroup of the torsion-completion of an (unbounded) direct sum of cyclic p-groups. Then he can find another pure subgroup H with the same socle \(H[p]=G[p]\) but not isomorphic to G. The proof uses heavily the combinatorial machinery as \(\lambda\)-sets and \(\lambda\)-systems. It would be desirable (e.g. a good master thesis) to derive a more algebraic proof from the author's arguments. Clearly, there are other ``invariants'' which could be prescribed at the same time and still \(G\not\cong H\).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    G.C.H.
    0 references
    pure subgroup
    0 references
    torsion-completion
    0 references
    direct sum of cyclic p-groups
    0 references
    socle
    0 references
    \(\lambda \)-sets
    0 references
    \(\lambda \)-systems
    0 references