Remarks on unit indices of imaginary abelian number fields (Q1108319): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5512252 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5843509 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The unit indices of imaginary abelian number fields / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A note on class numbers of algebraic number fields / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3943047 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 18:51, 18 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Remarks on unit indices of imaginary abelian number fields
scientific article

    Statements

    Remarks on unit indices of imaginary abelian number fields (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1988
    0 references
    Let \(K\) be an imaginary abelian field. Within its unit group, the real units together with the roots of unity generate a subgroup of index \(Q_K=1\) or 2. This number is called the unit index of \(K\). A result proved by \textit{H. Hasse} in his monograph ``Über die Klassenzahl abelscher Zahlkörper'' [Berlin: Akademie-Verlag (1952; Zbl 0046.26003); reprint (1985; Zbl 0668.12003)] states that \(Q_K=1\) if \(f\), the conductor of \(K\), is a prime power. The present authors determine \(Q_ K\) in cases \(f\) is \(4p^a\), \(p^aq^b\) or \(2^np^a\) \((n\geq 3)\), where \(p\) and \(q\) are different odd primes and, in the third case, \(8\nmid p-1\). They also study \(Q_K\) for \(f=8p\) with \(8| p-1\), and for \(f=4pq\). The results provide many examples of cases in which \(Q_K=1\) but \(K\) contains a subfield \(k\) with \(Q_k=2\). It is pointed out how one should modify the places in Hasse's book [op. cit.] where it is erroneously assumed that \(Q_K\) be divisible by \(Q_k\).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    class numbers
    0 references
    real units
    0 references
    unit index
    0 references
    counterexamples to Satz 29 in Hasse's monograph
    0 references