No extendable biplane of order nine (Q1113908): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0097-3165(88)90025-8 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2029512250 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Extending symmetric designs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3863891 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3885773 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3932736 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The nonexistence of ovals in a projective plane of order 10 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A New Family of Partially Balanced Incomplete Block Designs with Some Latin Square Design Properties / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the uniqueness of the Golay codes / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Maximal arcs in designs / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 10:28, 19 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
No extendable biplane of order nine
scientific article

    Statements

    No extendable biplane of order nine (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1988
    0 references
    A t-(v,k,\(\lambda)\) design is a v-set S provided with a collection of k- subsets of s, called blocks, such that any t-subset of S is contained in exactly \(\lambda\) blocks. Using coding theoretic arguments, the author proves the nonexistence of a 3-(57,12,2) design. Together with a result of \textit{P. J. Cameron} [J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A 14, 215-220 (1973; Zbl 0252.05010)] and the nonexistence of a 3-(112,12,1) design [\textit{C. W. H. Lam}, \textit{L. Thiel}, \textit{S. Swiercz}, and \textit{J. Mckay}, Discrete Math. 45, 319-321 (1983; Zbl 0574.05008)] this shows that the only extendable biplane is the one of order three.
    0 references
    symmetric design
    0 references
    t-(v,k,\(\lambda \) ) design
    0 references
    biplane
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers