Bad cases for shaker-sort (Q1114410): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0190(88)90158-5 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2026555151 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5585020 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3796768 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 10:36, 19 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Bad cases for shaker-sort
scientific article

    Statements

    Bad cases for shaker-sort (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1988
    0 references
    It is shown, by example, that shaker-sort is quadratic in the worst case for the specific increments suggested by its authors, Incerpi and Sedgewick, and that simple variations of these increment sequences do not do significantly better. At the same time, shaker-sort does not seem to be significantly faster than shell-sort for any file size, especially when good increment sequences are used for shell-sort.
    0 references
    sorting
    0 references
    shaker-sort
    0 references
    shell-sort
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers