Maintaining range trees is secondary memory. Part II: Lower bounds (Q1120282): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Decomposable searching problems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Maintaining range trees in secondary memory. Part I: Partitions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4729324 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Adding range restriction capability to dynamic data structures / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 15:19, 19 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Maintaining range trees is secondary memory. Part II: Lower bounds
scientific article

    Statements

    Maintaining range trees is secondary memory. Part II: Lower bounds (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1990
    0 references
    When storing and maintaining a data structure in secondary memory it is important to partition it into parts such that each query and update passes through a small number of parts. In this way the number of disk accesses and the amount of data tansport required can be kept low. In Part I of this paper a number of partition schemes were given for partitioning range trees. In this paper we study lower bounds of partitions. In this way we prove that many of the partitions given in Part I are optimal.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    data structure
    0 references
    lower bounds for partitions
    0 references