Speeding up dynamic programming with applications to molecular biology (Q1121182): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(89)90101-1 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2087817903 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Least Weight Subsequence Problem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Optimum binary search trees / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Breaking paragraphs into lines / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Sequence comparison with concave weighting functions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: General methods of sequence comparison / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The concave least-weight subsequence problem revisited / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Speed-Up in Dynamic Programming / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 15:31, 19 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Speeding up dynamic programming with applications to molecular biology
scientific article

    Statements

    Speeding up dynamic programming with applications to molecular biology (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1989
    0 references
    Consider the problem of computing \[ E[j]=\min_{0\leq k\leq j- 1}\{D[k]+w(k,j)\},\quad j=1,...,n, \] where w is a given weight function, D[0] is given and for every \(k=1,...,n\), D[k] is easily computable from E[k]. Obviously, it can be solved in time \(O(n^ 2)\), and for a general weight function no better algorithm is possible. In this paper, two dual cases that arise in applications are considered: In the concave case, the weight function satisfies the quadrangle inequality: \[ w(k,j)+w(\ell,j')\leq w(\ell,j)+w(k,j'),\quad for\quad all\quad k\leq \ell \leq j\leq j'. \] In the convex case, the weight function satisfies the inverse quadrangle inequality. In both cases it is shown how to use the assumed property of w to derive an O(n log n) algorithm. Even better, linear-time algorithms are obtained if w satisfies the following additional closest zero property: for every two integers \(\ell\) and k, \(\ell <k\), the real number a, the smallest zero of \(f(x)=w(\ell,x)-w(k,x)-a\) which is larger than k can be found in constant time. The two algorithms speed up several dynamic programming routines that solve as a subproblem the problem above. The speed-up is from \(O(n^ 3)\) to \(O(n^ 2 \log n)\) or \(O(n^ 2)\). Applications include algorithms for comparing DNA sequences and algorithms used in speech recognition and geology. One typical problem is the following: Given the cost of substituting any pair of symbols and a convex cost function g for gaps (where g(r) is the cost of a gap of size r), compute the modified edit distance between the two given sequences.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    weight function
    0 references
    linear-time algorithms
    0 references
    closest zero property
    0 references
    DNA sequences
    0 references
    speech recognition
    0 references
    geology
    0 references
    0 references