Homeomorphism versus isomorphism for varieties (Q1262911): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5576163 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5602063 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Seminormal rings and weakly normal varieties / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3674811 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4745926 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Further Pathologies in Algebraic Geometry / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4771357 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On seminormality / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5605674 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On grade and formal connectivity for weakly normal varieties / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Corrections to “Seminormal rings and weakly normal varieties” / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Some results on weakly normal ring extensions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3712409 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 11:44, 20 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Homeomorphism versus isomorphism for varieties
scientific article

    Statements

    Homeomorphism versus isomorphism for varieties (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1989
    0 references
    Let f: \(Y\to X\) be a morphism of algebraic varieties over a fixed algebraically closed field, which is birational and a homeomorphism of the underlying topological spaces. If X is weakly normal [\textit{A. Andreotti} and \textit{E. Bombieri}, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa, Sci. Fis. Mat., III. Ser. 23, 431-450 (1969; Zbl 0184.245)]), it was assumed by several authors (the papers are indicated) that then f is an isomorphism of varieties. In the paper, the author gives a counterexample to this assumption and proves that it is true under the assumption that X has no one-dimensional components. - As a corollary he obtains a characterization of the weak normalization of a variety X without one-dimensional components.
    0 references
    birational morphism
    0 references
    weak normalization
    0 references
    one-dimensional components
    0 references

    Identifiers