S-unit equations over number fields (Q922582): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4106278 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3781167 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On equations in S-units and the Thue-Mahler equation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3338318 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3786527 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Zur Approximation algebraischer Zahlen. I: Über den grössten Primteiler binärer Formen / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The \(\mathfrak p\)-adic Thue-Siegel-Roth-Schmidt theorem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The number of subspaces occurring in the p-adic subspace theorem in diophantine approximation. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An explicit upper bound for the number of solutions of the S-unit equation. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4009397 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4732523 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 11:43, 21 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
S-unit equations over number fields
scientific article

    Statements

    S-unit equations over number fields (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1990
    0 references
    Let K be an algebraic number field of degree d and S a finite set of places of K of cardinality s, containing all infinite places. The S-unit equation \((1)\quad a_ 1x_ 1+...+a_ nx_ n=1\) in S-units \(x_ 1,...,x_ n\) has only finitely many solutions without vanishing subsums, i.e. with \(a_{i_ 1}x_{i_ 1}+...+a_{i_ t}x_{i_ t}\neq 0\) for each non-empty subset \(\{i_ 1,...,i_ t\}\) of \(\{\) 1,...,n\(\}\). \textit{K. Györy} and the reviewer [Compos. Math. 66, 329-354 (1988; Zbl 0644.10015)] proved that there is a finite number C such that for all \(a_ 1,...,a_ n\in K^*\) (1) has at most C solutions, without being able to compute explicitly such a C. In [J. Reine Angew. Math. 406, 109- 120 (1990; Zbl 0693.10016)] the author shows that for \(K={\mathbb{Q}}\) one may take \(C=(8s)^{2^{26n+4}s^ 6}.\) In the paper under review, the author shows that for arbitrary K, \(C=(8sd!)^{2^{36nd!}s^ 6}\) can be taken. The idea of his proof is as follows. By using his own quantitative subspace theorem over number fields, the author derives an upper bound for the minimal number of proper linear subspaces of \(K^ n\) containing the set of all solutions of (1). In fact, the author obtains such an upper bound independent of \(a_ 1,...,a_ n\) with the help of some ``gap principle'' developed by himself (independently, Györy and the reviewer (loc. cit.) obtained a similar gap principle for S-unit equations over function fields). Then the proof is finished by induction on n.
    0 references
    0 references
    gap principle
    0 references
    S-unit equations
    0 references