Unipotent representations of Lie incidence geometries (Q2256992): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q115375971, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1719269348057
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2056023077 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: 1307.6892 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q115375971 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Revision as of 00:49, 25 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Unipotent representations of Lie incidence geometries
scientific article

    Statements

    Unipotent representations of Lie incidence geometries (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    23 February 2015
    0 references
    In [J. Algebr. Comb. 18, No. 3, 211--243 (2003; Zbl 1041.51006)], the author outlined a general theory of embeddings for certain geometries into groups and expansions of such geometries to a group via an embedding. In particular, he dealt with the hulls of certain embeddings of projective spaces, polar spaces, Grassmannians of projective spaces, dual polar spaces and half-spin geometries. In the paper under review, the author takes up these investigations. If \(\Gamma\) is the residue of a flag \(A\) in the \(J\)-shadow geometry of a spherical building \(\Delta\) of rank \(n\geq3\) where \(J\) is the type of \(A\), then unipotent representations are considered, that is, embeddings of \(\Gamma\) into the unipotent radical of the stabilizer of a flag opposite to \(A\) in the group of all type-preserving automorphisms of \(\Delta\). It is shown that quadratic Veronesean embeddings and Hermitian Veronesean embeddings of projective spaces are unipotent representations. The main purpose of the paper is the examination of two cases that have not been dealt with in the author's earlier paper. These are the 27-dimensional projective embedding of \(E_{6,1}(\mathbb{F})\) and the 56-dimensional projective embedding of \(E_{7,7}(p)\), both of which are linearly dominant. For both embeddings descriptions of their hulls as unipotent representations are obtained. As a corollary it is moreover shown that the subgeometry of \(E_7(\mathbb{F})\) far from a 7-element and the subgeometry of \(E_8(p)\) far from an 8-element are simply connected.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    point-line geometry
    0 references
    embedding
    0 references
    projective embedding
    0 references
    spherical building
    0 references
    geometry far from a flag
    0 references
    unipotent radical
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references