Progressive optimization of inverse fluid dynamic design problems (Q1818732): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q126552115, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1719531041801
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A comparison of optimization-based approaches for a model computational aerodynamics design problem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Aerodynamic design via control theory / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4882073 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4335368 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Single-Cycle Scheme: A New Approach to Numerical Optimization / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3026626 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4739659 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Contribution to the optimal shape design of two-dimensional internal flows with embedded shocks / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Supercritical wing sections II. A handbook / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q126552115 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 00:33, 28 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Progressive optimization of inverse fluid dynamic design problems
scientific article

    Statements

    Progressive optimization of inverse fluid dynamic design problems (English)
    0 references
    27 February 2001
    0 references
    The title problem is solved for compressible flows by a method which has three essential features: a) the procedure allows the use of highly accurate flow solvers which need no additional modifications; b) efficient design sensitivities are obtained using a discrete adjoint formulation; c) the procedure involves a progressive optimization, the main contribution of the authors. The method is applied to subsonic, transonic and supersonic flows in different geometries: transonic diffuser, transonic bump in channel, subsonic bump in channel, supersonic diffuser, transonic airfoils. The numerical results are presented in many suggestive plots, and are compared with results in the existing literature.
    0 references
    compressible flows
    0 references
    design sensitivities
    0 references
    discrete adjoint formulation
    0 references
    progressive optimization
    0 references
    transonic diffuser
    0 references
    transonic bump in channel
    0 references
    subsonic bump in channel
    0 references
    supersonic diffuser
    0 references
    transonic airfoils
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references