A paradox in a queueing network with state-dependent routing and loss (Q933905): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1993424297 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Über ein Paradoxon aus der Verkehrsplanung / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Non-cooperative routing in loss networks / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Braess's paradox in a loss network / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Network routing / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: How bad is selfish routing? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: User-Optimal State-Dependent Routeing in Parallel Tandem Queues with Loss / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Downs-Thomson Effect in a Markov Process / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Braess's paradox in a queueing network with state-dependent routing / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Asymptotically Optimal Loss Network Control / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Alternative routeing in fully connected queueing networks / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 13:49, 28 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A paradox in a queueing network with state-dependent routing and loss
scientific article

    Statements

    A paradox in a queueing network with state-dependent routing and loss (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    28 July 2008
    0 references
    Summary: Consider a network of parallel finite tandem queues with two stages, where each arrival attempts to minimize its own cost due to loss. It is known that the user optimal and asymptotic system optimal policies may differ-we give examples showing that they may differ for finite systems and that as the service rate is increased at the second stage the user optimal policy may change in such a way that the total expected cost due to loss increases.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references