Performance of composite implicit time integration scheme for nonlinear dynamic analysis (Q1023240): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2160486740 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4269570 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Time Integration Algorithm for Structural Dynamics With Improved Numerical Dissipation: The Generalized-α Method / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Constraint energy momentum algorithm and its application to nonlinear dynamics of shells / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The discrete energy-momentum method. Conserving algorithms for nonlinear elastodynamics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5560619 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A co‐rotational element/time‐integration strategy for non‐linear dynamics / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 15:19, 1 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Performance of composite implicit time integration scheme for nonlinear dynamic analysis
scientific article

    Statements

    Performance of composite implicit time integration scheme for nonlinear dynamic analysis (English)
    0 references
    11 June 2009
    0 references
    Summary: This paper presents a simple implicit time integration scheme for transient response solution of structures under large deformations and long-time durations. The authors focus on a practical method using implicit time integration scheme applied to structural dynamic analyses in which the widely used Newmark time integration procedure is unstable, and not energy-momentum conserving. In this integration scheme, the time step is divided in two substeps. For too large time steps, the method is stable but shows excessive numerical dissipation. The influence of different substep sizes on the numerical dissipation of the method is studied throughout three practical examples. The method shows good performance and may be considered good for nonlinear transient response of structures.
    0 references
    small time steps
    0 references
    large time steps
    0 references
    numerical dissipation
    0 references

    Identifiers