Properties of subgroups not containing their centralizers. (Q1034193): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2323822858 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The Number of Conjugacy Classes / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5654235 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4858090 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A lower bound for the number of conjugacy classes in a finite nilpotent group / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 04:26, 2 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Properties of subgroups not containing their centralizers. |
scientific article |
Statements
Properties of subgroups not containing their centralizers. (English)
0 references
11 November 2009
0 references
A classic result of R. Baer shows that a divisible Abelian group is injective. In the paper under review Theorem 2.1 has weakened this result, replacing the property of being divisible with a more general property, called ``N'' condition: ``Let \(H\) be a subgroup of an arbitrary group \(G\). There exists a \(g\in G\setminus H\) such that \([g,H]=1\)''. Corollaries of splitting, of the form of those which were originally obtained by R. Baer, can be deduced from Theorem 2.1 and they are illustrated in Section 2. On the other hand, it is easy to note that the ``N'' condition is equivalent to require that \(C_G(H)\not\leq H\) (incidentally, the title of the paper expresses exactly this fact) and then it is possible to see if there are relations with the size of suitable conjugacy classes. The answer is positive for finite \(p\)-groups (\(p\) prime) in the sense of Theorem 3.1, where it has been found a bound for the number of maximal subgroups satisfying the condition ``N''.
0 references
divisible groups
0 references
finite \(p\)-groups
0 references
center
0 references
semi-direct products
0 references
numbers of conjugacy classes
0 references
numbers of maximal subgroups
0 references