The polynomial Fourier transform with minimum mean square error for noisy data (Q972771): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Joseph D. Lakey / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Joseph D. Lakey / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2010.02.039 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2054220080 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The polyharmonic local sine transform: a new tool for local image analysis and synthesis without edge effect / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3971134 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Theoretical Numerical Analysis / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5543516 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3254471 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3996272 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3149249 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3995624 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 20:05, 2 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The polynomial Fourier transform with minimum mean square error for noisy data
scientific article

    Statements

    The polynomial Fourier transform with minimum mean square error for noisy data (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    21 May 2010
    0 references
    Building on the earlier work of \textit{N. Saito} and \textit{J.-F. Remy} [Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 20, No. 1, 41--73 (2006; Zbl 1089.94003)], the authors consider various least squares approximation schemes involving polyharmonic local Fourier transforms (PHLFTs). The essential problem in each case is to minimize \(\|f-u_p-v_q\|\) in \(L^2[-1,1]\) where \(f\) is a noise-corrupted signal, \(u\) is a polynomial of degree at most \(p\), and \(v\) is a trigonometric polynomial of degree at most \(q\). One refers to a corresponding approximant \(u_p+v_q\) as a {\textit{one-step least squares approximant}}. It is shown that a best approximant exists when \(p\) and \(q\) are specified, and then that \(v_q\) has to be the partial Fourier sum of \(f-u_p\). In particular, such an approximation can be made with arbitrary precision by allowing \(q\) to be large enough. If one specifies that \(u\) has the same boundary values as \(f\), that the degrees \(p,q\) are fixed, and that \(v_q\) is the partial Fourier series of \(f-u\), the approximant \(u_p+v_q\) is called the {\textit{near least squares approximant}}. The authors also consider a {\textit{two-step}} approximant in which a minimizer \(u_\ast\) of \(\|f-u_p\|\) is found first, and then \(\|(f-u_\ast)-v_q\|\) is minimized. Polyharmonic approximations are constructed using Hermite interpolants. For example, Theorem 2.11 states that if \(f\in C^{2m}[-1,1]\) has an \((m-1)\)st derivative that is Hölder continuous of order \(\alpha\in (0,1]\), then its PHLFT representation of order \(m\) has the form \(f(t)=\phi(t)+{1\over \sqrt 2} \sum_{} c_j e^{i j\pi t}\), where \(\phi\) is a Hermite interpolating polynomial of degree at most \(2m-1\) satisfying the polyharmonic equation \(\phi^{(2m)}=0\) and \(f^{(\ell)}(\pm 1) =\phi{(\ell)}(\pm 1)\), \(\ell\leq m\), so that the Fourier coefficients \(c_j\) decay like \(O(j^{-m-1})\). One then obtains a near-least squares approximant by truncating the Fourier series to degree \(q\), and these approximants converge uniformly of order \(O(\log{q}/q^{m-1-\alpha})\) as \(q\to\infty\). Approximate numerical implementations of the one-step least squares, two-step least squares, near least squares, and PHLFT approximations are all considered and experimental results are compared. The one-step approximation scheme is the most accurate, although the near least squares and PHLFT approximations are nearly as good in \(\ell^2\), and better in \(\ell^\infty\) for uncorrupted data with high SNR. The one-step and two-step methods perform better, though, both in \(\ell^2\) and \(\ell^\infty\), when noise levels are high.
    0 references
    algebraic polynomials
    0 references
    trigonometric polynomials
    0 references
    least squares approximation
    0 references
    mean square error
    0 references
    noisy data
    0 references

    Identifiers