On the nature of equilibria in a Downsian model with candidate valence (Q608545): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2010.01.012 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2008818149 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Mixed equilibrium in a Downsian model with a favored candidate / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Electoral Competition Between Two Candidates of Different Quality: The Effects of Candidate Ideology and Private Information / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Elections with platform and valence competition / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bounds for mixed strategy equilibria and the spatial model of elections / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A noncooperative analysis of Hotelling's location game / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Candidate ability and platform choice / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Equilibrium existence for zero-sum games and spatial models of elections / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: ``One and a half dimensional'' preferences and majority rule / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Games with randomly disturbed payoffs: a new rationale for mixed-strategy equilibrium points / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Nature of Equilibrium in a Location Model / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Equilibrium in Hotelling's Model of Spatial Competition / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3576736 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Campaign Advertising and Voter Welfare / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Compaign spending with office-seeking politicians, rational voters, and multiple lobbies / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 12:12, 3 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the nature of equilibria in a Downsian model with candidate valence
scientific article

    Statements

    On the nature of equilibria in a Downsian model with candidate valence (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    25 November 2010
    0 references
    The author presents a characterization of the optimal actions for candidates in a particular mixed strategy equilibrium that may arise in a Downsian model in which one candidate possesses a valence advantage, such as having a greater experience in public office or having previous successes in improving the country's economy. He assumes an election between two office-motivated candidates \(A\) and \(D\), where \(A\) is the candidate with superior valence, and a discrete one dimensional policy space. Let \(x_A\) be the policy chosen by \(A\), \(x_D\) the policy chosen by \(D\) and let \(x_m\) be the ideal point of the median voter, not observed by either candidate. Also it is assumed that a voter prefers the candidate with superior valence unless the other candidate chooses a policy that is sufficiently closer to \(x_m\). The author shows that in this equilibrium there is a range of moderate policies with no gaps that are optimal actions for the advantaged candidate \(A\). There is also a range of liberal policies with no gaps and a corresponding range of conservative policies with no gaps that are optimal actions for the disadvantaged candidate \(D\). He also characterizes the bounds on these ranges of optimal actions. The most moderate policy guaranteed to be an optimal action for the disadvantaged candidate \(D\) becomes less moderate as the size of \(A\)'s advantage increases; and the most extreme policy that is optimal for \(A\) is more moderate than the most extreme policy that is optimal for \(D\) by an amount approximately proportional to the size of \(A\)'s advantage. The author makes clear that the results when a candidate has a large valence advantage can differ significantly from the results when a candidate has a minimal valence advantage: in the last case the candidates randomize amongst virtually identical sets of policies, while in the first case there need not be any overlap between the optimal actions for \(A\) and the optimal actions for \(D\).
    0 references
    candidate valence
    0 references
    Downsian model
    0 references
    mixed equilibrium
    0 references
    policy selection
    0 references

    Identifiers