The poset of closure systems on an infinite poset: detachability and semimodularity (Q616624): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On closure operators / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Lattices and ordered algebraic structures / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Join congruence relations and closure relations / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q2741274 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The lattices of closure systems, closure operators, and implicational systems on a finite set: A survey / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4530231 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Characterizations of Finite Lattices that are Bounded-Homomqrphic Images or Sublattices of Free Lattices / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: THE LATTICE THEORY OF FUNCTIONAL DEPENDENCIES AND NORMAL DECOMPOSITIONS / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 14:52, 3 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The poset of closure systems on an infinite poset: detachability and semimodularity
scientific article

    Statements

    The poset of closure systems on an infinite poset: detachability and semimodularity (English)
    0 references
    12 January 2011
    0 references
    Summary: Closure operators on a poset can be characterized by the corresponding closure systems. It is known that in a directed complete partial order (DCPO), in particular in any finite poset, the collection of all closure systems is closed under arbitrary intersection and has a ``detachability'' or ``anti-matroid'' property, which implies that the collection of all closure systems is a lower semimodular complete lattice (and dually, the closure operators form an upper semimodular complete lattice). After reviewing the history of the problem, we generalize these results to the case of an infinite poset where closure systems do not necessarily constitute a complete lattice; thus the notions of lower semimodularity and detachability are extended accordingly. We also give several examples showing that many properties of closure systems on a complete lattice do not extend to infinite posets.
    0 references
    poset
    0 references
    closure operator
    0 references
    closure system
    0 references
    MLB-closed set
    0 references
    detachability
    0 references
    lower semimodularity
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers