On the univalence of an integral operator defined by Hadamard product (Q659835): Difference between revisions

The authors are investigating the univalence of analytic functions in the unit disc, given by the formula \[ F_{\alpha,\beta}(z)= \Biggl[\alpha \int^z_0 t^{\alpha-1} \Biggl[{(f_1* g_1)(t)\over \phi_1(t)}\Biggr]^{\beta_1}\cdots \Biggl[{(f_m* g_m)(t)\over \phi_m(t)}\Biggr]^{\beta_m}\,dt\Biggr]^{{1\over\alpha}}, \] in which the terms have the following meaning: \(\alpha\) is a complex number, as well as all \(\beta_i\), \(i= 1,2,\dots, m\); the convolution product is meant in the sense of Hadamard, namely, for two analytic function in the unit disc \(U\), \[ f(z)= z+ \sum^\infty_{k=2} a_k z^k\text{ and }g(z)= + \sum^\infty_{k=2} b_k z^k,\;(f*g)= z+ \sum^\infty_{k=2} a_k b_k z^k. \] The real valued functions \(\phi_i(t)\), \(i= 1,\dots, m\), can be chosen to obtain some classes of univalent functions in the unit disc, already investigate by several authors. If the inequalities \[ \Biggl|{z(f_i* g_i)'(z)\over (f_i* g_i)(z)}\Biggr|\leq {1+\gamma\over 1-\gamma},\quad \Biggl|{z\phi_i'(z)\over \phi_i(z)}\Biggr|\leq 1,\quad (z\in \mathbb{U},\,i= 1,\dots, m) \] are satisfied, for a number \(\gamma\in (0,1)\), then any function given by (1) is univalent in \(U\).