Strict finitism and the happy sorites (Q427227): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-011-9180-8 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2022416907 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Don't eliminate cut / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4523478 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4215630 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4215631 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5719494 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Wang's paradox / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4133603 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5736161 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Hairier than Putnam Thought / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4239945 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Strict finitism / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 08:53, 5 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Strict finitism and the happy sorites
scientific article

    Statements

    Strict finitism and the happy sorites (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    13 June 2012
    0 references
    A sorites argument is happy just in case it has true premisses and a false conclusion. Philosophical treatments of sorites generally begin with examples of what appear to be happy sorites, but end by ruling them out. Strict finitism is the version of constructivism which requires that effecting a construction or surveying a proof be in practice within our capacity. (An intuitionist requires merely that it be in principle within our capacity, which may require inspecting more steps than would in fact be practical.) It appears to offer an opening for happy sorites. Nevertheless, careful thought is needed to assess whether strict finitism is committed to the existence of any happy sorites arguments, and under what conditions.
    0 references
    0 references
    vaguesness
    0 references
    happy sorites
    0 references
    sorites paradox
    0 references
    strict finitism
    0 references
    intuitionism
    0 references
    constructivism
    0 references
    cut elimination
    0 references
    induction
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references