On the continual Rubik's cube (Q1759382): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2012.09.010 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2166960278 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3764803 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3409343 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: ON UNIQUE RECOVERABILITY OF CONVEX AND VISIBLE COMPACTA FROM THEIR PROJECTIONS / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On unique reconstructibility of convex and visible compact sets from their projections. II / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Radon transform. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: If you can hide behind it, can you hide inside it? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4340096 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Convex Bodies with Congruent Sections / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 22:25, 5 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the continual Rubik's cube
scientific article

    Statements

    On the continual Rubik's cube (English)
    0 references
    20 November 2012
    0 references
    The main result of the paper is Theorem 1. Let \( f \) and \( g \) be two continuous functions on the unit sphere \(S^{n-1} \subset {\mathbb R}^n \), \( n \geq 3\), and let their restrictions onto any one-dimensional great circle \(E \subset S^{n-1}\) coincide after some rotation \(\phi_E\) of this circle: \(f(\phi_E(\theta))=g(\theta) \) for all \(\theta \in E\). Then \(f(\theta)=g(\theta)\) or \(f(\theta)=g(-\theta)\) for all \(\theta \in S^{n-1}\). This answers the question formulated in [\textit{V. P. Golubyatnikov}, Sib. Math. J. 36, No. 2, 265--269 (1995); translation from Sib. Mat. Zh. 36, No. 2, 301--307 (1995; Zbl 0865.52004)]. Using this theorem, the author obtains the following. Theorem 2. Let \( n \geq 3\) and let \(K\) and \(L\) be two convex bodies in \( {\mathbb R}^n \) containing the origin in their interior. Then \(K=L\) or \(K= - L\), provided the projections \( K \mid H \), \(L \mid H\) onto any two-dimensional subspace \(H\) of \({\mathbb R}^n\) are rotations of each other around the origin. Theorem 3. Let \(K\) and \(L\) be two star-shaped bodies with respect to the origin in \( {\mathbb R}^n\), \( n \geq 3\). Then \(K=L\) or \(K= - L\), provided the sections \( K \cap H \), \(L \cap H\) by any two-dimensional subspace \(H\) of \(\, {\mathbb R}^n\) are rotations of each other around the origin. These two theorems are closely related to higher-dimensional open problems formulated in [\textit{R. J. Gardner}, Geometric tomography. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2006; Zbl 1102.52002)] for more general cases \( 2 \leq \dim H \leq n-1\).
    0 references
    convex bodies
    0 references
    Funk transform
    0 references
    star-shaped bodies
    0 references
    translates of convex bodies
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers