Minimum symbol error probability MIMO design under the per-antenna power constraint (Q693791): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/290390 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2093298512 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Robust power allocation algorithms for MIMO OFDM systems with imperfect CSI / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Constructing a Hermitian Matrix from Its Diagonal Entries and Eigenvalues / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4384476 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Estimation of the eigenvalues of AB for \(A>0\), \(B>0\) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Matrix Analysis / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 00:10, 6 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Minimum symbol error probability MIMO design under the per-antenna power constraint
scientific article

    Statements

    Minimum symbol error probability MIMO design under the per-antenna power constraint (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    11 December 2012
    0 references
    Summary: Approximate minimum symbol error probability transceiver design of single user MIMO systems under the practical per-antenna power constraint is considered. The upper bound of a lower bound on the minimum distance between the symbol hypotheses is established. Necessary conditions and structures of the transmit covariance matrix for reaching the upper bound are discussed. Three numerical approaches (rank zero, rank one, and permutation) for obtaining the optimum precoder are proposed. When the upper bound is reached, the resulting design is optimum. When the upper bound is not reached, a numerical fix is used. The approach is very simple and can be of practical use.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references