On the Frobenius stable part of Witt vector cohomology (Q1938420): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2141750519 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: 1007.5000 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On Witt vector cohomology for singular varieties / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: \(L\) functions associated to overconvergent \(F\)-isocrystals. II: Unit roots and poles / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Complexe de de\thinspace Rham-Witt et cohomologie cristalline / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 04:50, 6 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the Frobenius stable part of Witt vector cohomology
scientific article

    Statements

    On the Frobenius stable part of Witt vector cohomology (English)
    0 references
    4 February 2013
    0 references
    This paper is of interest to those studying number theory and algebraic geometry. It studies a generalization of some classical trace formulas relating the action of Frobenius on the cohomology of certain sheaves to the cardinality of the set \(X(k)\) for \(k\) a finite field. A typical application of a trace formula is to compute the cardinality of \(X(k)\) modulo \(p\) by knowing the cohomology of the structure sheaf \(\mathcal{O}_X\). Let \(q=p^a\) and \(F\) be the morphism \(F(f) = f^q\). If \(X\) is a proper scheme over \(k\) then Katz gives the trace formula \[ \sum_{i \geq 0} (-1)^i \mathrm{Tr}(F: H^i(X,\mathcal{O}_X) \rightarrow H^i(X,\mathcal{O}_X)) \equiv \mathrm{Card}(X(k)) \text{ mod }p. \] Bloch-Illusie and Berthelot-Bloch-Esnault give another trace formula \[ \sum_{i \geq 0} (-1)^i \mathrm{Tr}(F: H^i(X,W\mathcal{O}_X)_{\mathbb{Q}} \rightarrow H^i(X,W\mathcal{O}_X)_{\mathbb{Q}}) \equiv \mathrm{Card}(X(k)) \text{ mod }q \] where \(W\mathcal{O}_X\) is the sheaf of Witt vectors on \(X\). The first main result of the paper under review is a refinement of these trace formulas to the length \(n\) Witt vectors \(W_n(\mathcal{O}_X)\). If for all \(i\), \(H^i(X, W_n \mathcal{O}_X)\) is a free \(W_n(k)\) module then \[ \sum_{i \geq 0} (-1)^i \mathrm{Tr}(F: H^i(X,W_n\mathcal{O}_X) \rightarrow H^i(X,W_n\mathcal{O}_X)) \equiv \mathrm{Card}(X(k)) \text{ mod }\min\{q, p^n\}. \] The second main result of the paper under review is a result on the vanishing of cohomology. If \(k\) is a perfect field, \(X\) is an affine Cohen-Macaulay \(k\)-scheme and equidimensional of dimension \(d\) then \[ H^i_c(X, \mathcal{O}_X)_s = 0 \] for all \(i \neq d\) where \(H^i_c(X, \mathcal{O}_X)_s\) are the Frobenius stable cohomology groups. The reviewed manuscript contains a very nice account of the relationship of Frobenius stable cohomology to rigid cohomology and étale cohomology. For example, the conclusion of the second main result implies that in this setting \[ H^i_{\acute{e}t, c}(X \times_k \overline{k}, \mathbb{Z}/p) =0 \text{ for all } i \neq d. \]
    0 references
    0 references
    trace formula
    0 references
    Frobenius stable cohomology
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references