A note on numerical range and product of matrices (Q1940106): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2012.12.031 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2005205688 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Numerical range and product of matrices / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4040931 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 05:41, 6 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A note on numerical range and product of matrices
scientific article

    Statements

    A note on numerical range and product of matrices (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    5 March 2013
    0 references
    Let \(A\) be a \(n\)-by-\(n\) matrix. We use \(\sigma(A)\) and \(W(A)\) for the spectrum and the numerical range of \(A\). A well-known result in matrix theory states that if \(A\) is positive semidefinite matrix, then \(\sigma(AB)\subseteq W(A)W(B)\) for all \(B\in M_n\). \textit{R. Alizadeh} [ibid. 437, No. 6, 1422--1425 (2012; Zbl 1259.15033)] proved the converse of this result. That is: Let \(A\in M_n\). Then \(\sigma(AB)\subseteq W(A)W(B)\) for all \(B\in M_n\) if and only if \(A\) is a scalar multiple of a positive semidefinite matrix. But if 0 is in the interior of \(W(A)\), then the presented proof does not work. In this paper, the authors prove this theorem again.
    0 references
    spectrum
    0 references
    numerical range
    0 references
    positive semidefinite matrix
    0 references

    Identifiers