Mass operator and dynamical implementation of mass superselection rule (Q1949805): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2101213318 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: 1205.1372 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On unitary ray representations of continuous groups / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3786658 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Operational Quantum Physics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On Galilei invariance in quantum mechanics and the Bargmann superselection rule / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3909512 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 11:19, 6 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Mass operator and dynamical implementation of mass superselection rule
scientific article

    Statements

    Mass operator and dynamical implementation of mass superselection rule (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    17 May 2013
    0 references
    As shown by Bargmann in 1954 Galileian invariance implies a superselection rule for the masses of a non-relativistic quantum mechanical system, i.e. a formal superposition of pure states with different mass values does not represent a pure state. In several papers, Giulini stressed that the usual Galileian interpretation of de-coherence effect does not allow any dynamical approach. Instead, he re-interpreted Bargmann's rule within another framework assuming a central extension of the Galileian group which provides an explicit mass operator. The present paper is organized as follows. After explaining the details of a specific Hamiltonian and the underlying Hilbert space, Giulini's approach is reviewed from a more mathematical point of view, thereby proposing some improvements of his framework. The mass operator is modified so as to obtain a positive discrete spectrum. The model remains to be invariant under time reversal. However, another degree of freedom arises describing a conserved internal charge. Everything here relies on the hypothesis that the mass operator has a discrete spectrum. This assumption guarantees the validity of the presented results. There does not seem to exist any general physical a-priori principle justifying this assumption.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    quantum mechanical system
    0 references
    mass operator
    0 references
    Galileian invariance
    0 references
    superselection rule
    0 references
    de-coherence
    0 references
    central extension
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references