A note on the bivariate Coppersmith theorem (Q2377067): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00145-012-9121-x / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2093762739 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Small solutions to polynomial equations, and low exponent RSA vulnerabilities / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Advances in Cryptology - EUROCRYPT 2004 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Finding Small Roots of Bivariate Integer Polynomial Equations: A Direct Approach / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 14:47, 6 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A note on the bivariate Coppersmith theorem
scientific article

    Statements

    A note on the bivariate Coppersmith theorem (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    27 June 2013
    0 references
    In this note the authors provide a proof of a result of \textit{D. Coppersmith} [J. Cryptology 10, No. 4, 233--260 (1997; Zbl 0912.11056)], whose original proof they claim to be incomplete. That result, Corollary 2 of the Coppersmith's paper and quoted here as Corollary 1, assures that we can efficiently compute all the roots \((x_0,y_0)\), with \(x_0,y_0\) bounded, of an irreducible bivariate polynomial \(p(x,y)\) defined over the integers. Such a result is related with an attack to a particular instance of the RSA cryptosystem. The note also points out that the gap in the paper of Coppersmith also exists in other papers inspired by it, in particular in two papers of the first author of the present note, and that the solution proposed here ``applies to those other papers as well''. The engaged proof of Corollary 1 is given in the Section 2 of the Note (Lemmas 1 and 2).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Copppersmith's theorem
    0 references
    bivariate polynomials
    0 references
    small roots
    0 references
    0 references