The axioms for \(n\)-angulated categories (Q351704): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: n-angulated categories / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3061967 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3764313 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Some new axioms for triangulated categories / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Triangulated Categories / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5515129 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4193642 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4342453 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 14:34, 6 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | The axioms for \(n\)-angulated categories |
scientific article |
Statements
The axioms for \(n\)-angulated categories (English)
0 references
9 July 2013
0 references
A triangulated category is an additive category with an automorphism together with the datum of so-called distinguished triangles subject to several axioms. For instance, the derived category of complexes over an abelian category is triangulated. Now, \(n\)-angulated categories, introduced by Geiss, Keller and Oppermann, are a generalization of the above concept. Roughly speaking, triangles become sequences of length \(n\) while keeping appropriate versions of the axioms. In the paper under review the authors discuss how the first two (of four) original axioms in the definition of an \(n\)-angulated category can be replaced by equivalent ones. Furthermore, the original fourth axiom (the mapping cone axiom) is checked to be equivalent to a higher octahedral axiom introduced in this paper. In the case \(n=3\) the authors show that the mapping cone, the higher octahedral and the original octahedral axiom are equivalent.
0 references
triangulated categories
0 references
\(n\)-angulated categories
0 references
octahedral axiom
0 references