Integrating imaging data into predictive biomathematical and biophysical models of cancer (Q355902): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/287394 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2001974997 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3224332 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A mathematical model for brain tumor response to radiation therapy / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Applying a patient-specific bio-mathematical model of glioma growth to develop virtual [18F]-FMISO-PET images / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 15:50, 6 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Integrating imaging data into predictive biomathematical and biophysical models of cancer
scientific article

    Statements

    Integrating imaging data into predictive biomathematical and biophysical models of cancer (English)
    0 references
    25 July 2013
    0 references
    Summary: While there is a mature literature on biomathematical and biophysical modeling in cancer, many of the existing approaches are not of clinical utility, as they require input data that are extremely difficult to obtain in an intact organism, and/or require a large number of assumptions on the free parameters included in the models. Thus, there has only been very limited application of such models to solve problems of clinical import. More recently, however, there has been increased activity at the interface of quantitative, noninvasive imaging data, and tumor mathematical modeling. In addition to reporting on bulk tumor morphology and volume, emerging imaging techniques can quantitatively report on for example tumor vascularity, glucose metabolism, cell density and proliferation, and hypoxia. We first motivate the problem of predicting therapy response by highlighting some (acknowledged) shortcomings in existing methods. We then provide introductions to a number of representative quantitative imaging methods and describe how they are currently (and potentially can be) used to initialize and constrain patient specific mathematical and biophysical models of tumor growth and treatment response, thereby increasing the clinical utility of such approaches. We conclude by highlighting some of the exciting research directions when one integrates quantitative imaging and tumor modeling.
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references