Distributive proper forcing axiom and cardinal invariants (Q365665): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Property / review text | |||
In what follows, we assume the reader is familiar with all notions involved in the definitions of Martin's Axiom (\textbf{MA}) and the Proper Forcing Axiom (\textbf{PFA}) -- if this is not the case, see, respectively, [\textit{D. A. Martin} and \textit{R. M. Solovay}, Ann. Math. Logic 2, 143--178 (1970; Zbl 0222.02075)] and [\textit{J. E. Baumgartner}, in: Handbook of set-theoretic topology, 913--959 (1984; Zbl 0556.03040)]. \textbf{BPFA} denotes the Bounded Proper Forcing Axiom [\textit{J. Bagaria}, Arch. Math. Logic 39, No. 6, 393--401 (2000; Zbl 0966.03047)]. If \(\kappa\) is a regular cardinal, a partial order \(\mathbb{P}\) is said to be \textit{\(\kappa\)-distributive} if forcing with \(\mathbb{P}\) adds no new sequence of ordinals with length less than \(\kappa\), and it is said to be \textit{distributive} if it is \(\aleph_1\)-distributive. For proper partial orders, distributivity is equivalent to the following property: forcing with \(\mathbb{P}\) adds no new reals. Let \textbf{DPFA} be the restriction of \textbf{PFA} to distributive orders, i.e., let \textbf{DPFA} be the statement: ``If \(\mathbb{P}\) is distributive and proper and \(\mathcal{D}\) is a family of \(\aleph_1\) dense subsets of \(\mathbb{P}\), then there is a filter \(G \subseteq \mathbb{P}\) such that \(G \cap D \neq \emptyset\) for all \(D \in \mathcal{D}\).'' In the paper under review, the author investigates the relationship between the forcing axiom \textbf{DPFA} and many known cardinal invariants, and applies his results to distinguish several forcing axioms. The main theorem of the paper is the following (we assume now the reader is familiar with all mentioned cardinal invariants): Theorem. If it is consistent that a supercompact cardinal exists, then it is consistent that \textbf{DPFA} holds and all the following cardinal invariants are equal to \(\aleph_1\): \(\mathfrak{a}\), \(\mathfrak{b}\), \(\mathfrak{d}\), \(\mathfrak{e}\), \(\mathfrak{g}\), \(\mathfrak{h}\), \(\mathfrak{i}\), \(\mathfrak{m}\), \(\mathfrak{p}\), \(\mathfrak{r}\), \(\mathfrak{s}\), \(\mathfrak{t}\), \(\mathfrak{u}\), \(\mathrm{add}(\mathbb{M})\), \(\mathrm{cov}(\mathbb{M})\), \(\mathrm{non}(\mathbb{M})\), \(\mathrm{cof}(\mathbb{M})\), \(\mathrm{add}(\mathbb{L})\), \(\mathrm{cov}(\mathbb{L})\), \(\mathrm{non}(\mathbb{L})\) and \(\mathrm{cof}(\mathbb{L})\). As a corollary, the author concludes, e.g., that the axiom \textbf{DPFA} does not imply any of the previously mentioned axioms (that is, none of \textbf{MA}, \textbf{BPFA} and \textbf{PFA} are consequences of \textbf{DPFA}). | |||
Property / review text: In what follows, we assume the reader is familiar with all notions involved in the definitions of Martin's Axiom (\textbf{MA}) and the Proper Forcing Axiom (\textbf{PFA}) -- if this is not the case, see, respectively, [\textit{D. A. Martin} and \textit{R. M. Solovay}, Ann. Math. Logic 2, 143--178 (1970; Zbl 0222.02075)] and [\textit{J. E. Baumgartner}, in: Handbook of set-theoretic topology, 913--959 (1984; Zbl 0556.03040)]. \textbf{BPFA} denotes the Bounded Proper Forcing Axiom [\textit{J. Bagaria}, Arch. Math. Logic 39, No. 6, 393--401 (2000; Zbl 0966.03047)]. If \(\kappa\) is a regular cardinal, a partial order \(\mathbb{P}\) is said to be \textit{\(\kappa\)-distributive} if forcing with \(\mathbb{P}\) adds no new sequence of ordinals with length less than \(\kappa\), and it is said to be \textit{distributive} if it is \(\aleph_1\)-distributive. For proper partial orders, distributivity is equivalent to the following property: forcing with \(\mathbb{P}\) adds no new reals. Let \textbf{DPFA} be the restriction of \textbf{PFA} to distributive orders, i.e., let \textbf{DPFA} be the statement: ``If \(\mathbb{P}\) is distributive and proper and \(\mathcal{D}\) is a family of \(\aleph_1\) dense subsets of \(\mathbb{P}\), then there is a filter \(G \subseteq \mathbb{P}\) such that \(G \cap D \neq \emptyset\) for all \(D \in \mathcal{D}\).'' In the paper under review, the author investigates the relationship between the forcing axiom \textbf{DPFA} and many known cardinal invariants, and applies his results to distinguish several forcing axioms. The main theorem of the paper is the following (we assume now the reader is familiar with all mentioned cardinal invariants): Theorem. If it is consistent that a supercompact cardinal exists, then it is consistent that \textbf{DPFA} holds and all the following cardinal invariants are equal to \(\aleph_1\): \(\mathfrak{a}\), \(\mathfrak{b}\), \(\mathfrak{d}\), \(\mathfrak{e}\), \(\mathfrak{g}\), \(\mathfrak{h}\), \(\mathfrak{i}\), \(\mathfrak{m}\), \(\mathfrak{p}\), \(\mathfrak{r}\), \(\mathfrak{s}\), \(\mathfrak{t}\), \(\mathfrak{u}\), \(\mathrm{add}(\mathbb{M})\), \(\mathrm{cov}(\mathbb{M})\), \(\mathrm{non}(\mathbb{M})\), \(\mathrm{cof}(\mathbb{M})\), \(\mathrm{add}(\mathbb{L})\), \(\mathrm{cov}(\mathbb{L})\), \(\mathrm{non}(\mathbb{L})\) and \(\mathrm{cof}(\mathbb{L})\). As a corollary, the author concludes, e.g., that the axiom \textbf{DPFA} does not imply any of the previously mentioned axioms (that is, none of \textbf{MA}, \textbf{BPFA} and \textbf{PFA} are consequences of \textbf{DPFA}). / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Samuel Gomes da Silva / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03E17 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03E35 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03E55 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03E57 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6206977 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
proper forcing axiom | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: proper forcing axiom / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
cardinal invariants | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: cardinal invariants / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
iterated forcing | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: iterated forcing / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
preservation theorem | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: preservation theorem / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-013-0327-x / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2074098940 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Wikidata QID | |||
Property / Wikidata QID: Q114018319 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Additivity of Measure Implies Additivity of Category / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4844091 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3220578 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Combinatorial Cardinal Characteristics of the Continuum / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: There may be simple \(P_{\aleph _ 1}\)- and \(P_{\aleph _ 2}\)-points and the Rudin-Keisler ordering may be downward directed / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4848573 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The bounded proper forcing axiom / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Set Theory / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Making the supercompactness of \(\nu\) indestructible under \(\nu\)-directed closed forcing / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Internal cohen extensions / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Bounded iteration and unary functions / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Maximal almost disjoint families of functions / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Homogeneity problems in the theory of Cech compactifications / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: CON(\(\mathfrak u>\mathfrak i\)) / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Iterated Cohen extensions and Souslin's problem / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Partition Problems in Topology / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4523069 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
links / mardi / name | links / mardi / name | ||
Latest revision as of 21:15, 6 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Distributive proper forcing axiom and cardinal invariants |
scientific article |
Statements
Distributive proper forcing axiom and cardinal invariants (English)
0 references
9 September 2013
0 references
In what follows, we assume the reader is familiar with all notions involved in the definitions of Martin's Axiom (\textbf{MA}) and the Proper Forcing Axiom (\textbf{PFA}) -- if this is not the case, see, respectively, [\textit{D. A. Martin} and \textit{R. M. Solovay}, Ann. Math. Logic 2, 143--178 (1970; Zbl 0222.02075)] and [\textit{J. E. Baumgartner}, in: Handbook of set-theoretic topology, 913--959 (1984; Zbl 0556.03040)]. \textbf{BPFA} denotes the Bounded Proper Forcing Axiom [\textit{J. Bagaria}, Arch. Math. Logic 39, No. 6, 393--401 (2000; Zbl 0966.03047)]. If \(\kappa\) is a regular cardinal, a partial order \(\mathbb{P}\) is said to be \textit{\(\kappa\)-distributive} if forcing with \(\mathbb{P}\) adds no new sequence of ordinals with length less than \(\kappa\), and it is said to be \textit{distributive} if it is \(\aleph_1\)-distributive. For proper partial orders, distributivity is equivalent to the following property: forcing with \(\mathbb{P}\) adds no new reals. Let \textbf{DPFA} be the restriction of \textbf{PFA} to distributive orders, i.e., let \textbf{DPFA} be the statement: ``If \(\mathbb{P}\) is distributive and proper and \(\mathcal{D}\) is a family of \(\aleph_1\) dense subsets of \(\mathbb{P}\), then there is a filter \(G \subseteq \mathbb{P}\) such that \(G \cap D \neq \emptyset\) for all \(D \in \mathcal{D}\).'' In the paper under review, the author investigates the relationship between the forcing axiom \textbf{DPFA} and many known cardinal invariants, and applies his results to distinguish several forcing axioms. The main theorem of the paper is the following (we assume now the reader is familiar with all mentioned cardinal invariants): Theorem. If it is consistent that a supercompact cardinal exists, then it is consistent that \textbf{DPFA} holds and all the following cardinal invariants are equal to \(\aleph_1\): \(\mathfrak{a}\), \(\mathfrak{b}\), \(\mathfrak{d}\), \(\mathfrak{e}\), \(\mathfrak{g}\), \(\mathfrak{h}\), \(\mathfrak{i}\), \(\mathfrak{m}\), \(\mathfrak{p}\), \(\mathfrak{r}\), \(\mathfrak{s}\), \(\mathfrak{t}\), \(\mathfrak{u}\), \(\mathrm{add}(\mathbb{M})\), \(\mathrm{cov}(\mathbb{M})\), \(\mathrm{non}(\mathbb{M})\), \(\mathrm{cof}(\mathbb{M})\), \(\mathrm{add}(\mathbb{L})\), \(\mathrm{cov}(\mathbb{L})\), \(\mathrm{non}(\mathbb{L})\) and \(\mathrm{cof}(\mathbb{L})\). As a corollary, the author concludes, e.g., that the axiom \textbf{DPFA} does not imply any of the previously mentioned axioms (that is, none of \textbf{MA}, \textbf{BPFA} and \textbf{PFA} are consequences of \textbf{DPFA}).
0 references
proper forcing axiom
0 references
cardinal invariants
0 references
iterated forcing
0 references
preservation theorem
0 references
0 references