Should we revitalize the Maya numerals? (Q393482): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5584546 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3787941 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5633948 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3126738 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A note on the irregularity of graphs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5572275 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 06:04, 7 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Should we revitalize the Maya numerals?
scientific article

    Statements

    Should we revitalize the Maya numerals? (English)
    0 references
    23 January 2014
    0 references
    This article presents divisibility tests, along the line of ``casting out nines'', in various numeration systems: base-10, -12, and -20, as well as the modified base-20 scheme used in the Mayan Long Count calendar. Since the latter incorporates factors of 3, besides 2 and 5, it often allows simpler tests than base-10. The author gives such qualitative comparisons a spurious precision by assigning to each numeration system a score, given to four (decimal) significant figures.
    0 references
    Maya
    0 references
    long count calendar
    0 references
    numeration systems
    0 references
    divisibility tests
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers