Should we revitalize the Maya numerals? (Q393482): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5584546 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3787941 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5633948 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3126738 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A note on the irregularity of graphs / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5572275 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 06:04, 7 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Should we revitalize the Maya numerals? |
scientific article |
Statements
Should we revitalize the Maya numerals? (English)
0 references
23 January 2014
0 references
This article presents divisibility tests, along the line of ``casting out nines'', in various numeration systems: base-10, -12, and -20, as well as the modified base-20 scheme used in the Mayan Long Count calendar. Since the latter incorporates factors of 3, besides 2 and 5, it often allows simpler tests than base-10. The author gives such qualitative comparisons a spurious precision by assigning to each numeration system a score, given to four (decimal) significant figures.
0 references
Maya
0 references
long count calendar
0 references
numeration systems
0 references
divisibility tests
0 references