Coisotropic submanifolds and dual pairs (Q464317): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Alberto Sergio Cattaneo / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / review text
 
Consider a finite-dimensional manifold \(M\). Denote by \(I\) the unit interval \([0, 1]\). The space of differentiable paths on \(M\) is denoted by \(P M := C^1 (I, M)\), and the space of bundle maps \( T I \to T^*M\) with continuously differentiable base map and continuous fiber map is denoted by \(T^*P M\). The space \(P M\) is considered as a Banach manifold and \(T^*P M\) as a Banach, weak symplectic manifold (a weak symplectic form is a closed 2-form that induces an injective map from the tangent to the cotangent bundle). Fix a section \(\pi\) in \(TM \otimes TM\), and consider its induced bundle map \(\pi^{\sharp}: T^*M \to TM\). For two given submanifolds \(C_{0}\) and \(C_{1}\) of \(M\), denoted by \(\mathcal{C}_{\pi}(M; C_0,C_1)\), the subpace of \(T^*PM\) of ``\(\pi\)-compatible path'' from \(C_0\) to \(C_1\), and by \(p_i: \mathcal{C}_{\pi}(M; C_0,C_1) \to C_i\), \(i=0,1\), the canonical maps. Contrary to the case when \(C_0=C_1=M\), \(\mathcal{C}_{\pi}(M; C_0,C_1)\) is not in general a Banach submanifold. Although, \(\mathcal{C}_{\pi}(M; C_0,C_1)\) is not a submanifold, one still can define the coisotropy criteria, using the notion of tangent bundle with fibers being the Zarisky tangent space at each point. Specifically, in the symplectic case, a subvariety (i.e., a common zero set of a family of smooth functions) is said to be \textit{coisotropic} when its symplectic orthogonal bundle is contained in its tangent bundle. The first main result of the paper says that \(\mathcal{C}_{\pi}(M; M,M)\) is coisotropic in \(T^*PM\) if and only if, \(\pi\) is a Poisson bivector field. The later means that \(\pi\) is a skew-symmetric 2-tensor field satisfying \([\pi,\pi]=0\), where \([\,,\,]\) is the Schouten-Nijenhuis bracket. The second main result asserts that, if \(\pi\) is a Poisson bivector field, then \(\mathcal{C}_{\pi}(M; C_0,C_1)\) is coisotropic in \(T^*PM\) if and only if the subsets \(\mathrm{Im}(p_0)\) and \(\mathrm{Im}(p_1)\) are coisotropic in \(M\) relative to \(C_0\) and \(C_1\) respectively, i.e., \(\pi^{\sharp}(N^*_xC_i) \subseteq T_xC_i\), for all \(x \in \mathrm{Im}(p_i)\), \(i=0,1\).
Property / review text: Consider a finite-dimensional manifold \(M\). Denote by \(I\) the unit interval \([0, 1]\). The space of differentiable paths on \(M\) is denoted by \(P M := C^1 (I, M)\), and the space of bundle maps \( T I \to T^*M\) with continuously differentiable base map and continuous fiber map is denoted by \(T^*P M\). The space \(P M\) is considered as a Banach manifold and \(T^*P M\) as a Banach, weak symplectic manifold (a weak symplectic form is a closed 2-form that induces an injective map from the tangent to the cotangent bundle). Fix a section \(\pi\) in \(TM \otimes TM\), and consider its induced bundle map \(\pi^{\sharp}: T^*M \to TM\). For two given submanifolds \(C_{0}\) and \(C_{1}\) of \(M\), denoted by \(\mathcal{C}_{\pi}(M; C_0,C_1)\), the subpace of \(T^*PM\) of ``\(\pi\)-compatible path'' from \(C_0\) to \(C_1\), and by \(p_i: \mathcal{C}_{\pi}(M; C_0,C_1) \to C_i\), \(i=0,1\), the canonical maps. Contrary to the case when \(C_0=C_1=M\), \(\mathcal{C}_{\pi}(M; C_0,C_1)\) is not in general a Banach submanifold. Although, \(\mathcal{C}_{\pi}(M; C_0,C_1)\) is not a submanifold, one still can define the coisotropy criteria, using the notion of tangent bundle with fibers being the Zarisky tangent space at each point. Specifically, in the symplectic case, a subvariety (i.e., a common zero set of a family of smooth functions) is said to be \textit{coisotropic} when its symplectic orthogonal bundle is contained in its tangent bundle. The first main result of the paper says that \(\mathcal{C}_{\pi}(M; M,M)\) is coisotropic in \(T^*PM\) if and only if, \(\pi\) is a Poisson bivector field. The later means that \(\pi\) is a skew-symmetric 2-tensor field satisfying \([\pi,\pi]=0\), where \([\,,\,]\) is the Schouten-Nijenhuis bracket. The second main result asserts that, if \(\pi\) is a Poisson bivector field, then \(\mathcal{C}_{\pi}(M; C_0,C_1)\) is coisotropic in \(T^*PM\) if and only if the subsets \(\mathrm{Im}(p_0)\) and \(\mathrm{Im}(p_1)\) are coisotropic in \(M\) relative to \(C_0\) and \(C_1\) respectively, i.e., \(\pi^{\sharp}(N^*_xC_i) \subseteq T_xC_i\), for all \(x \in \mathrm{Im}(p_i)\), \(i=0,1\). / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Laiachi El Kaoutit / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 53D17 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 81T45 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 53D20 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 58H05 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6358054 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
coisotropic submanifolds
Property / zbMATH Keywords: coisotropic submanifolds / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
dual pairs
Property / zbMATH Keywords: dual pairs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
Poisson sigma model
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Poisson sigma model / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
Lagrangian field theories with boundary
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Lagrangian field theories with boundary / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / author
 
Property / author: Alberto Sergio Cattaneo / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: Publication / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W3104525591 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: 1306.3249 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Poisson reduction and branes in Poisson-sigma models / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the integration of Poisson manifolds, Lie algebroids, and coisotropic submanifolds / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: GROUPOIDS AND POISSON SIGMA MODELS WITH BOUNDARY / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Classical BV theories on manifolds with boundary / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q2762051 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Coisotropic submanifolds in Poisson geometry and branes in the Poisson sigma model / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Pre-Poisson submanifolds / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Poly-Poisson sigma models and their relational poly-symplectic groupoids / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Integrability of Lie brackets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Two-dimensional gravity and nonlinear gauge theory / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q2762054 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: POISSON STRUCTURE INDUCED (TOPOLOGICAL) FIELD THEORIES / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The local structure of Poisson manifolds / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Revision as of 04:14, 9 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Coisotropic submanifolds and dual pairs
scientific article

    Statements

    Coisotropic submanifolds and dual pairs (English)
    0 references
    17 October 2014
    0 references
    Consider a finite-dimensional manifold \(M\). Denote by \(I\) the unit interval \([0, 1]\). The space of differentiable paths on \(M\) is denoted by \(P M := C^1 (I, M)\), and the space of bundle maps \( T I \to T^*M\) with continuously differentiable base map and continuous fiber map is denoted by \(T^*P M\). The space \(P M\) is considered as a Banach manifold and \(T^*P M\) as a Banach, weak symplectic manifold (a weak symplectic form is a closed 2-form that induces an injective map from the tangent to the cotangent bundle). Fix a section \(\pi\) in \(TM \otimes TM\), and consider its induced bundle map \(\pi^{\sharp}: T^*M \to TM\). For two given submanifolds \(C_{0}\) and \(C_{1}\) of \(M\), denoted by \(\mathcal{C}_{\pi}(M; C_0,C_1)\), the subpace of \(T^*PM\) of ``\(\pi\)-compatible path'' from \(C_0\) to \(C_1\), and by \(p_i: \mathcal{C}_{\pi}(M; C_0,C_1) \to C_i\), \(i=0,1\), the canonical maps. Contrary to the case when \(C_0=C_1=M\), \(\mathcal{C}_{\pi}(M; C_0,C_1)\) is not in general a Banach submanifold. Although, \(\mathcal{C}_{\pi}(M; C_0,C_1)\) is not a submanifold, one still can define the coisotropy criteria, using the notion of tangent bundle with fibers being the Zarisky tangent space at each point. Specifically, in the symplectic case, a subvariety (i.e., a common zero set of a family of smooth functions) is said to be \textit{coisotropic} when its symplectic orthogonal bundle is contained in its tangent bundle. The first main result of the paper says that \(\mathcal{C}_{\pi}(M; M,M)\) is coisotropic in \(T^*PM\) if and only if, \(\pi\) is a Poisson bivector field. The later means that \(\pi\) is a skew-symmetric 2-tensor field satisfying \([\pi,\pi]=0\), where \([\,,\,]\) is the Schouten-Nijenhuis bracket. The second main result asserts that, if \(\pi\) is a Poisson bivector field, then \(\mathcal{C}_{\pi}(M; C_0,C_1)\) is coisotropic in \(T^*PM\) if and only if the subsets \(\mathrm{Im}(p_0)\) and \(\mathrm{Im}(p_1)\) are coisotropic in \(M\) relative to \(C_0\) and \(C_1\) respectively, i.e., \(\pi^{\sharp}(N^*_xC_i) \subseteq T_xC_i\), for all \(x \in \mathrm{Im}(p_i)\), \(i=0,1\).
    0 references
    coisotropic submanifolds
    0 references
    dual pairs
    0 references
    Poisson sigma model
    0 references
    Lagrangian field theories with boundary
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references