Selecting the best of portfolio using OWA operator weights in cross efficiency-evaluation (Q469994): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / describes a project that uses
 
Property / describes a project that uses: DEA / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/978314 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2026119718 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Measuring the efficiency of decision making units / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Portfolio performance evaluation in a mean--variance--skewness framework / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: PREFERENCE VOTING AND RANKING USING DEA GAME CROSS EFFICIENCY MODEL(<Special Issue>Operations Research for Performance Evaluation) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A benchmark-learning roadmap for regional sustainable development in China / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Achievement and benchmarking of countries at the Summer Olympics using cross efficiency evaluation method / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Cross-Evaluation In Dea: Improving Discrimination Among Dmus. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model and Its Nash Equilibrium / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A minimax disparity approach for obtaining OWA operator weights / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4890890 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 06:22, 9 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Selecting the best of portfolio using OWA operator weights in cross efficiency-evaluation
scientific article

    Statements

    Selecting the best of portfolio using OWA operator weights in cross efficiency-evaluation (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    11 November 2014
    0 references
    Summary: The present study is an attempt toward evaluating the performance of portfolios and asset selection using cross-efficiency evaluation. Cross-efficiency evaluation is an effective way of ranking decision making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA). The most widely used approach is to evaluate the efficiencies in each row or column in the cross-efficiency matrix with equal weights into an average cross-efficiency score for each DMU and consider it as the overall performance measurement of the DMU. This paper focuses on the evaluation process of the efficiencies in the cross-efficiency matrix and proposes the use of ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operator weights for cross-efficiency evaluation. The OWA operator weights are generated by the minimax disparity approach and allow the decision maker (DM) or investor to select the best assets that are characterized by an orness degree. The problem consists of choosing an optimal set of assets in order to minimize the risk and maximize return. This method is illustrated by application in mutual funds and weights are obtained via OWA operator for making the best portfolio. The finding could be used for constructing the best portfolio in stock companies, in various finance organization, and public and private sector companies.
    0 references

    Identifiers