An equilibrium analysis of Knaster's fair division procedure (Q2351206): Difference between revisions

Summary: In an incomplete information setting, we analyze the sealed bid auction proposed by Knaster (cf. [\textit{H. Steinhaus}, ``The problem of fair division'', Econometrica 16, 101--104 (1948)]). This procedure was designed to efficiently and fairly allocate multiple indivisible items when participants report their valuations truthfully. In equilibrium, players do not follow truthful bidding strategies. We find that, ex-post, the equilibrium allocation is still efficient but may not be fair. However, on average, participants receive the same outcome they would have received if everyone had reported truthfully -- i.e., the mechanism is ex-ante fair.