Minimal free resolutions for subschemes of star configurations (Q886981): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Comparing powers and symbolic powers of ideals / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Tower sets and other configurations with the Cohen-Macaulay property / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Star configurations in \(\mathbb{P}^n\) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the first infinitesimal neighborhood of a linear configuration of points in \(\mathbb P^2\) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Are symbolic powers highly evolved? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Progress in commutative algebra 1. Combinatorics and homology / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The minimal free graded resolution of a star-configuration in \(\mathbb{P}^n\) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Liaison des variétés algébriques. I / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Partial intersections and graded Betti numbers / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: PROPERTIES OF 3-CODIMENSIONAL GORENSTEIN SCHEMES / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 23:55, 10 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Minimal free resolutions for subschemes of star configurations
scientific article

    Statements

    Minimal free resolutions for subschemes of star configurations (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    27 October 2015
    0 references
    Let \(R=K[x_1,\dots,x_n]\). Let \(C_{c,n}\) denote the set of subsets of \(\{1,2,\dots,n\}\) with cardinality \(c\). For a subset \(S\) of \(C_{c,n}\), one can associate a squarefree monomial ideal \(I_S=\bigcap_{\{a_1,\dots,a_c\}\in S} (x_{a_1},\dots,x_{a_c})\) in \(R\) and vice versa. In particular, \(I_{C_{c,n}}\) defines the \textit{star configuration}. In the paper under review, the authors investigate the subschemes of a star configuration whose support \(S_{n,h}\) is a union of \(n-2h\) consecutive diagonals \(D_k\), where \(D_k=\{\{i,j\}\in C_{2,n} \mid |i-j|=k\}\) and \(S_{n,h}\) is defined recursively as follows: \(S_{n,h}=S_{n,h-1}\setminus (D_h\cup D_{n-h}), 2 \leq h \leq \frac{n-2}{2}\) with \(S_{n,1}=C_{2,n}\setminus P_n\), where \(P_n=\{ \{i,j\}\in C_{2,n}\mid |i-j|=1 \} \cup \{\{1,n\}\}\). The authors compute the minimal graded free resolutions of \(I_{S_{n,h}}\) for various values of \(h\) (Corollary 2.11, Theorem 3.6).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    star configuration
    0 references
    scheme
    0 references
    minimal free resolution
    0 references
    0 references