Superstrong and other large cardinals are never Laver indestructible (Q5964928): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1642382209 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q56813232 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: 1307.3486 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The least measurable can be strongly compact and indestructible / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4951682 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5477351 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The least strongly compact can be the least strong and indestructible / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Indestructibility of Vopěnka's principle / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Set-theoretic geology / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On certain indestructibility of strong cardinals and a question of Hajnal / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Fragile measurability / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Small forcing makes any cardinal superdestructible / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Gap Forcing: Generalizing the Lévy-Solovay Theorem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The lottery preparation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Gap forcing / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Extensions with the approximation and cover properties have no new large cardinals / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Strongly uplifting cardinals and the boldface resurrection axioms / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Indestructible strong unfoldability / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Resurrection axioms and uplifting cardinals / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Superdestructibility: A dual to Laver's indestructibility / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Strongly unfoldable cardinals made indestructible / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Making the supercompactness of \(\nu\) indestructible under \(\nu\)-directed closed forcing / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Certain very large cardinals are not created in small forcing extensions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the Hamkins approximation property / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The ground axiom / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the indestructibility aspects of identity crisis / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 13:09, 11 July 2024

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6548026
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Superstrong and other large cardinals are never Laver indestructible
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6548026

    Statements

    Superstrong and other large cardinals are never Laver indestructible (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    2 March 2016
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    large cardinals
    0 references
    forcing
    0 references
    indestructible cardinals
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references