Extensions with the approximation and cover properties have no new large cardinals (Q4811323)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2092555
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Extensions with the approximation and cover properties have no new large cardinals
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2092555

      Statements

      Extensions with the approximation and cover properties have no new large cardinals (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      19 August 2004
      0 references
      elementary embedding
      0 references
      large cardinals
      0 references
      preservation theorems
      0 references
      forcing
      0 references
      It is well known that `small' forcings do not destroy large cardinals, e.g., adding a Cohen real will not make an uncountable measurable cardinal non-measurable. The author investigates the possible creation of large cardinals. The main result of the paper gives conditions when an elementary embedding of a larger universe induces a similar embedding in a smaller universe: if \(V\subseteq\overline{V}\) and if \(\delta\)~is a cardinal such that \ 1)~if \(A\subseteq V\) belongs to \(\overline{V}\) and if \(A\cap a\in V\) whenever \(a\in V\) has size less than~\(\delta\) then \(A\in V\) (\(\delta\)-approximation), and \ 2)~if \(A\subseteq V\) belongs to \(\overline{V}\) and \(| A| <\delta\) in \(\overline{V}\) then there is \(B\in V\) with \(A\subseteq B\) and \(| B| <\delta\) in \(V\) (\(\delta\)-covering). In this case an elementary embedding \(j:\overline{V}\to\overline{M}\) with critical point above~\(\delta\) restricts to an elementary embedding \(j\upharpoonright V:V\to M\), where \(M=\overline{M}\cap V\). This results is then applied to show that, above such a \(\delta\), the universe \(\overline{V}\) has no large cardinals not already in~\(V\); here `large' can be weakly compact, ineffable, indescribable, strong, Woodin, supercompact, \dots; for strong compactness extra conditions are needed for the proof but the author conjectures that they are not needed for the result.
      0 references

      Identifiers