Do transitive preferences always result in indifferent divisions? (Q296522): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Edward W. Piotrowski / rank | |||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Jan Sładkowski / rank | |||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Edward W. Piotrowski / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Jan Sładkowski / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / review text | |||
Summary: The transitivity of preferences is one of the basic assumptions used in the theory of games and decisions. It is often equated with the rationality of choice and is considered useful in building rankings. Intransitive preferences are considered paradoxical and undesirable. This problem is discussed by many social and natural scientists. A simple model of a sequential game in which two players choose one of the two elements in each iteration is discussed in this paper. The players make their decisions in different contexts defined by the rules of the game. It appears that the optimal strategy of one of the players can only be intransitive (the so-called relevant intransitive strategy)! On the other hand, the optimal strategy for the second player can be either transitive or intransitive. A quantum model of the game using pure one-qubit strategies is considered. In this model, an increase in the importance of intransitive strategies is observed: there is a certain course of the game where intransitive strategies are the only optimal strategies for both players. The study of decision-making models using quantum information theory tools may shed some new light on the understanding of mechanisms that drive the formation of types of preferences. | |||
Property / review text: Summary: The transitivity of preferences is one of the basic assumptions used in the theory of games and decisions. It is often equated with the rationality of choice and is considered useful in building rankings. Intransitive preferences are considered paradoxical and undesirable. This problem is discussed by many social and natural scientists. A simple model of a sequential game in which two players choose one of the two elements in each iteration is discussed in this paper. The players make their decisions in different contexts defined by the rules of the game. It appears that the optimal strategy of one of the players can only be intransitive (the so-called relevant intransitive strategy)! On the other hand, the optimal strategy for the second player can be either transitive or intransitive. A quantum model of the game using pure one-qubit strategies is considered. In this model, an increase in the importance of intransitive strategies is observed: there is a certain course of the game where intransitive strategies are the only optimal strategies for both players. The study of decision-making models using quantum information theory tools may shed some new light on the understanding of mechanisms that drive the formation of types of preferences. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 91B08 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 91A35 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6593675 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
relevant intransitive strategies | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: relevant intransitive strategies / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
quantum strategy | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: quantum strategy / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
quantum modeling | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: quantum modeling / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
decision-making | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: decision-making / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1986738777 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Wikidata QID | |||
Property / Wikidata QID: Q62582450 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / arXiv ID | |||
Property / arXiv ID: 1501.04063 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5310631 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Quantum Games and Quantum Strategies / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Quantum strategies / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: An invitation to quantum game theory / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Transitivity vs. Intransitivity in decision making process - an example in quantum game theory / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Transitivity of an entangled choice / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Decisions in elections—transitive or intransitive quantum preferences / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: When \textit{I cut, you choose} method implies intransitivity / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Nontransitive preferences in decision theory / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Nontransitive measurable utility / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Learning intransitive reciprocal relations with kernel methods / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: INTRANSITIVITY AND VAGUENESS / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Context-Dependent Preferences / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4338900 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3671875 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Quantum market games / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Type indeterminacy: A model of the KT(Kahneman-Tversky)-man / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Quantum type indeterminacy in dynamic decision-making: self-control through identity management / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Quantum dynamics of human decision-making / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The relationship between quantum and classical correlation in games / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
links / mardi / name | links / mardi / name | ||
Latest revision as of 03:39, 12 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Do transitive preferences always result in indifferent divisions? |
scientific article |
Statements
Do transitive preferences always result in indifferent divisions? (English)
0 references
15 June 2016
0 references
Summary: The transitivity of preferences is one of the basic assumptions used in the theory of games and decisions. It is often equated with the rationality of choice and is considered useful in building rankings. Intransitive preferences are considered paradoxical and undesirable. This problem is discussed by many social and natural scientists. A simple model of a sequential game in which two players choose one of the two elements in each iteration is discussed in this paper. The players make their decisions in different contexts defined by the rules of the game. It appears that the optimal strategy of one of the players can only be intransitive (the so-called relevant intransitive strategy)! On the other hand, the optimal strategy for the second player can be either transitive or intransitive. A quantum model of the game using pure one-qubit strategies is considered. In this model, an increase in the importance of intransitive strategies is observed: there is a certain course of the game where intransitive strategies are the only optimal strategies for both players. The study of decision-making models using quantum information theory tools may shed some new light on the understanding of mechanisms that drive the formation of types of preferences.
0 references
relevant intransitive strategies
0 references
quantum strategy
0 references
quantum modeling
0 references
decision-making
0 references
0 references
0 references