On the divisibility of permanents for \((\pm1)\)-matrices (Q308667): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Property / review text
 
If \(A = (a_{ij})\) is an \(n\times n\)-square matrix, the permanent of \(A\) is defined as \(\text{per}(A) = \sum_{\sigma \in \mathcal{S}_n} a_{1\sigma(1)}\cdots a_{n\sigma(n)}\) where \(\mathcal{S}_n\) denotes the set of permutations on \(\{1,\dots, n\}\). If the entries of \(A\) are elements of \(\{-1,1\}\), \textit{A. R. Kräuter} and \textit{N. Seifter} [Isr. J. Math. 45, 53--62 (1983; Zbl 0517.15009)] have shown that the \(2^{n-\lfloor \log_2(n)\rfloor-1}\) divides \(\mathrm {per}(A)\) and \(2^{n-\lfloor \log_2(n)\rfloor}\) divides \(\mathrm {per}(A)\) if and only if \(n\neq 2^t-1\) for all \(t\in\mathbb{N}\). The present paper gives an alternative proof for these results. For \(0\leq j\leq n\), let \(k_j\) denote the number of sets of cardinality \(j\) of the form \(\{(i_1,\sigma(i_1)), \dots ,(i_j,\sigma(i_j))\}\) such that \(a_{i_k, \sigma(i_k)}=-1\) for \(1\leq k\leq j\) and \(\sigma\in\mathcal{S}_n\). First, the authors show that \[ \mathrm {per}(A) = \sum_{j=0}^n (-2)^jk_j(n-j)! \] holds. Then they prove for \(0\leq j\leq n\) that \(2^{n-j +\lfloor \log_2(n)\rfloor -1}\) divides \((n-j)!\) and \(2^{n-j-\lfloor \log_2(n)\rfloor}\) divides \((n-j)!\) if and only if \(n\neq 2^t-1\) for all \(t\in\mathbb{N}\). Since \(k_0 = 1\), the results of Kräuter and Seifter [loc. cit.] follows.
Property / review text: If \(A = (a_{ij})\) is an \(n\times n\)-square matrix, the permanent of \(A\) is defined as \(\text{per}(A) = \sum_{\sigma \in \mathcal{S}_n} a_{1\sigma(1)}\cdots a_{n\sigma(n)}\) where \(\mathcal{S}_n\) denotes the set of permutations on \(\{1,\dots, n\}\). If the entries of \(A\) are elements of \(\{-1,1\}\), \textit{A. R. Kräuter} and \textit{N. Seifter} [Isr. J. Math. 45, 53--62 (1983; Zbl 0517.15009)] have shown that the \(2^{n-\lfloor \log_2(n)\rfloor-1}\) divides \(\mathrm {per}(A)\) and \(2^{n-\lfloor \log_2(n)\rfloor}\) divides \(\mathrm {per}(A)\) if and only if \(n\neq 2^t-1\) for all \(t\in\mathbb{N}\). The present paper gives an alternative proof for these results. For \(0\leq j\leq n\), let \(k_j\) denote the number of sets of cardinality \(j\) of the form \(\{(i_1,\sigma(i_1)), \dots ,(i_j,\sigma(i_j))\}\) such that \(a_{i_k, \sigma(i_k)}=-1\) for \(1\leq k\leq j\) and \(\sigma\in\mathcal{S}_n\). First, the authors show that \[ \mathrm {per}(A) = \sum_{j=0}^n (-2)^jk_j(n-j)! \] holds. Then they prove for \(0\leq j\leq n\) that \(2^{n-j +\lfloor \log_2(n)\rfloor -1}\) divides \((n-j)!\) and \(2^{n-j-\lfloor \log_2(n)\rfloor}\) divides \((n-j)!\) if and only if \(n\neq 2^t-1\) for all \(t\in\mathbb{N}\). Since \(k_0 = 1\), the results of Kräuter and Seifter [loc. cit.] follows. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Roswitha Rissner / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 15A15 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 15B34 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6623916 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
permanents
Property / zbMATH Keywords: permanents / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
matrices with entries in \(\{1,-1\}\)
Property / zbMATH Keywords: matrices with entries in \(\{1,-1\}\) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
divisibility by powers of 2
Property / zbMATH Keywords: divisibility by powers of 2 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-016-2937-4 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2462458910 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3998725 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5329152 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3722642 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On some questions concerning permanents of \((1,-1)\)-matrices / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Inequalities for the permanent function / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Positive diagonals of \(\pm 1\)-matrices / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Another Solution of an Old Problem of Polya / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On (+1,-1)-matrices with vanishing permanent / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On permanents of (1,-1)-matrices / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Permanents of matrices of signed ones / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 12:35, 12 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the divisibility of permanents for \((\pm1)\)-matrices
scientific article

    Statements

    On the divisibility of permanents for \((\pm1)\)-matrices (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    6 September 2016
    0 references
    If \(A = (a_{ij})\) is an \(n\times n\)-square matrix, the permanent of \(A\) is defined as \(\text{per}(A) = \sum_{\sigma \in \mathcal{S}_n} a_{1\sigma(1)}\cdots a_{n\sigma(n)}\) where \(\mathcal{S}_n\) denotes the set of permutations on \(\{1,\dots, n\}\). If the entries of \(A\) are elements of \(\{-1,1\}\), \textit{A. R. Kräuter} and \textit{N. Seifter} [Isr. J. Math. 45, 53--62 (1983; Zbl 0517.15009)] have shown that the \(2^{n-\lfloor \log_2(n)\rfloor-1}\) divides \(\mathrm {per}(A)\) and \(2^{n-\lfloor \log_2(n)\rfloor}\) divides \(\mathrm {per}(A)\) if and only if \(n\neq 2^t-1\) for all \(t\in\mathbb{N}\). The present paper gives an alternative proof for these results. For \(0\leq j\leq n\), let \(k_j\) denote the number of sets of cardinality \(j\) of the form \(\{(i_1,\sigma(i_1)), \dots ,(i_j,\sigma(i_j))\}\) such that \(a_{i_k, \sigma(i_k)}=-1\) for \(1\leq k\leq j\) and \(\sigma\in\mathcal{S}_n\). First, the authors show that \[ \mathrm {per}(A) = \sum_{j=0}^n (-2)^jk_j(n-j)! \] holds. Then they prove for \(0\leq j\leq n\) that \(2^{n-j +\lfloor \log_2(n)\rfloor -1}\) divides \((n-j)!\) and \(2^{n-j-\lfloor \log_2(n)\rfloor}\) divides \((n-j)!\) if and only if \(n\neq 2^t-1\) for all \(t\in\mathbb{N}\). Since \(k_0 = 1\), the results of Kräuter and Seifter [loc. cit.] follows.
    0 references
    permanents
    0 references
    matrices with entries in \(\{1,-1\}\)
    0 references
    divisibility by powers of 2
    0 references

    Identifiers