A quantitative Gobbard-Satterthwaite theorem without neutrality (Q343234): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Property / review text
 
From the authors' abstract: Quantitative versions of the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem have already been proven for \(k=3\) alternatives and for neutral functions on \(k\geq 4\) alternatives. Here we prove a quantitative version of the theorem for general social choice functions for any number \(k\geq 3\) of alternatives. In particular we show that for a social choice function \(f\) on \(k\geq 3\) alternatives and \(n\) voters, which is \(\varepsilon\)-far from the family of nonmanipulable functions, a uniformly chosen voter profile is manipulable with probability at least inverse polynomial in \(n\), \(k\), and \(\varepsilon^{-1}\). Ours is a unified proof which covers all previous cases established before. The proof crucially uses reverse hypercontractivity in addition to several ideas from the two previous proofs. Much of the work is devoted to understanding functions of a single voter, and in particular we also prove a quantitative Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem for one voter.
Property / review text: From the authors' abstract: Quantitative versions of the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem have already been proven for \(k=3\) alternatives and for neutral functions on \(k\geq 4\) alternatives. Here we prove a quantitative version of the theorem for general social choice functions for any number \(k\geq 3\) of alternatives. In particular we show that for a social choice function \(f\) on \(k\geq 3\) alternatives and \(n\) voters, which is \(\varepsilon\)-far from the family of nonmanipulable functions, a uniformly chosen voter profile is manipulable with probability at least inverse polynomial in \(n\), \(k\), and \(\varepsilon^{-1}\). Ours is a unified proof which covers all previous cases established before. The proof crucially uses reverse hypercontractivity in addition to several ideas from the two previous proofs. Much of the work is devoted to understanding functions of a single voter, and in particular we also prove a quantitative Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem for one voter. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Astrid Reifegerste / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 05A05 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6656664 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
rankings graph
Property / zbMATH Keywords: rankings graph / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00493-014-2979-5 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2610212012 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q2783476 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The computational difficulty of manipulating an election / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Positivity improving operators and hypercontractivity / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Quantitative Version of the Gibbard–Satterthwaite Theorem for Three Alternatives / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Testing monotonicity / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4458414 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The geometry of manipulation -- a quantitative proof of the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Almost all social choice rules are highly manipulable, but a few aren't / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Assignment of Numbers to Vertices / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A quantitative Arrow theorem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Non-interactive correlation distillation, inhomogeneous Markov chains, and the reverse Bonami-Beckner inequality / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A quantitative gibbard-satterthwaite theorem without neutrality / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3332693 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3624050 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 00:43, 13 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A quantitative Gobbard-Satterthwaite theorem without neutrality
scientific article

    Statements

    A quantitative Gobbard-Satterthwaite theorem without neutrality (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    25 November 2016
    0 references
    From the authors' abstract: Quantitative versions of the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem have already been proven for \(k=3\) alternatives and for neutral functions on \(k\geq 4\) alternatives. Here we prove a quantitative version of the theorem for general social choice functions for any number \(k\geq 3\) of alternatives. In particular we show that for a social choice function \(f\) on \(k\geq 3\) alternatives and \(n\) voters, which is \(\varepsilon\)-far from the family of nonmanipulable functions, a uniformly chosen voter profile is manipulable with probability at least inverse polynomial in \(n\), \(k\), and \(\varepsilon^{-1}\). Ours is a unified proof which covers all previous cases established before. The proof crucially uses reverse hypercontractivity in addition to several ideas from the two previous proofs. Much of the work is devoted to understanding functions of a single voter, and in particular we also prove a quantitative Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem for one voter.
    0 references
    0 references
    Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem
    0 references
    rankings graph
    0 references
    0 references