Anti-van der Waerden numbers of 3-term arithmetic progression (Q2363101): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: 1604.08819 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On rainbow arithmetic progressions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Sub-Ramsey numbers for arithmetic progressions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On Sets of Integers Which Contain No Three Terms in Arithmetical Progression / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Rainbow arithmetic progressions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A new proof of Szemerédi's theorem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Rainbow Arithmetic Progressions and Anti-Ramsey Results / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Rainbow arithmetic progressions in finite abelian groups / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 02:32, 14 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Anti-van der Waerden numbers of 3-term arithmetic progression
scientific article

    Statements

    Anti-van der Waerden numbers of 3-term arithmetic progression (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    13 July 2017
    0 references
    Summary: The \textit{anti-van der Waerden number}, denoted by \(\mathrm{aw}([n],k)\), is the smallest \(r\) such that every exact \(r\)-coloring of \([n]\) contains a rainbow \(k\)-term arithmetic progression. Butler et. al. showed that \(\lceil \log_3 n \rceil + 2 \leq \mathrm{aw}([n],3) \leq \lceil \log_2 n \rceil + 1\), and conjectured that there exists a constant \(C\) such that \(\mathrm{aw}([n],3) \leq \lceil \log_3 n \rceil + C\). In this paper, we show this conjecture is true by determining \(\mathrm{aw}([n],3)\) for all \(n\). We prove that for \(7\cdot 3^{m-2}+1 \leq n \leq 21 \cdot 3^{m-2}\), \[ \mathrm{aw}([n],3)=\begin{cases} m+2, & \text{if}\,\,n=3^m \\ m+3, & \text{otherwise}. \end{cases} \]
    0 references
    arithmetic progression
    0 references
    rainbow coloring
    0 references
    unitary coloring
    0 references
    Behrend construction
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references