A combinatorial description of topological complexity for finite spaces (Q1743504): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2405606735 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: 1605.06755 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Algebraic topology of finite topological spaces and applications / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Strong homotopy types, nerves and collapses / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Topological complexity of motion planning / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On category, in the sense of Lusternik-Schnirelmann / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Singular homology groups and homotopy groups of finite topological spaces / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Finite Topological Spaces / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 12:13, 15 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A combinatorial description of topological complexity for finite spaces
scientific article

    Statements

    A combinatorial description of topological complexity for finite spaces (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    13 April 2018
    0 references
    Let \(P\) be a finite \(T_0\) space. The main goal of the paper under review is to develop and study a version of topological complexity introduced by \textit{M. Farber} for finite spaces \(P\). The author calls this the \textbf{combinatorial complexity}, denoted \(\mathrm{CC}(P)\). This is defined as follows: Let \(J_m\) denote the finite space consisting of \(m+1\) points with ordering given by a ``zigzag'' that is, \[ 0<1>2<\dots>(<)m. \] A \textbf{combinatorial path of \(P\) with length \(m\)} is a continuous map \(\gamma : J_m\to P\). For any \(m\geq 0\), define \(\mathrm{CC}_m(P)\) to be the smallest nonnegative integer \(n\) such that there is an open cover \(\{Q_i\}_{i=1}^n\) of \(P\times P\) with a continuous section \(s_i: Q_i\to P^{J_m}\) of \(q_m: P^{J_m}\to P\times P\) given by \(q_m(\gamma):=(\gamma(0),\gamma(m))\). The \textbf{combinatorial complexity} of \(P\) is then the minimum of \(\mathrm{CC}_m(P)\) over all \(m\). The author is able to show that this value corresponds with the usual notion of topological complexity in the finite space case. Theorem 3.2. For a finite space \(P\), \(\mathrm{TC}(P)=\mathrm{CC}(P)\). There are then several examples given illustrating methods of computing this value for certain finite spaces. The last section is devoted to studying how the combinatorial complexity behaves under barycentric subdivision. Inspired by the recent work of \textit{J. González} [New York J. Math. 24, 279--292 (2018; Zbl 1394.55004)] on simplicial complexity \(\mathrm{SC}(K)\), the author defines \(\mathrm{CC}^k(P)\) to be a certain notion of the combinatorial complexity of \(P\) involving the \(k^{th}\) barycentric subdivision. He is then able to relate his computational complexity to González's simplicial complexity in a very pleasing result. Theorem 4.9. For finite space \(P\), \(\mathrm{SC}(\mathrm{K}(P))=\mathrm{CC}^{\infty}(P)\) where \(\mathcal{K}(P)\) is the order complex of \(P\). Applying a result of González, an immediate corollary is that Corollary 4.10. \(\mathrm{TC}(|\mathrm{K}(P)|)=\mathrm{CC}^{\infty}(P)\) It seems, then, that with the work of both Tanaka and González, there are new avenues which we can explore that might allow us to more easily compute or at least estimate topological complexity.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    topological complexity
    0 references
    finite space
    0 references
    order complex
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references