Performance of synthetic double sampling chart with estimated parameters based on expected average run length (Q1658210): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7583610 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2805153058 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Sample size calculation for controlling false discovery proportion / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4648980 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Accounting for phase I sampling variability in the performance of the MEWMA control chart with estimated parameters / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
links / mardi / name | links / mardi / name | ||
Latest revision as of 08:45, 16 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Performance of synthetic double sampling chart with estimated parameters based on expected average run length |
scientific article |
Statements
Performance of synthetic double sampling chart with estimated parameters based on expected average run length (English)
0 references
14 August 2018
0 references
Summary: A synthetic double sampling (SDS) chart is commonly evaluated based on the assumption that process parameters (namely, mean and standard deviation) are known. However, the process parameters are usually unknown and must be estimated from an in-control Phase-I dataset. This will lead to deterioration in the performance of a control chart. The average run length (ARL) has been implemented as the common performance measure in process monitoring of the SDS chart. Computation of ARL requires practitioners to determine shift size in advance. However, this requirement is too restricted as practitioners may not have the experience to specify the shift size in advance. Thus, the expected average run length (EARL) is introduced to assess the performance of the SDS chart when the shift size is random. In this paper, the SDS chart, with known and estimated process parameters, was evaluated based on EARL and compared with the performance measure, ARL.
0 references