Performance of synthetic double sampling chart with estimated parameters based on expected average run length (Q1658210): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7583610 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2805153058 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Sample size calculation for controlling false discovery proportion / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4648980 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Accounting for phase I sampling variability in the performance of the MEWMA control chart with estimated parameters / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 08:45, 16 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Performance of synthetic double sampling chart with estimated parameters based on expected average run length
scientific article

    Statements

    Performance of synthetic double sampling chart with estimated parameters based on expected average run length (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    14 August 2018
    0 references
    Summary: A synthetic double sampling (SDS) chart is commonly evaluated based on the assumption that process parameters (namely, mean and standard deviation) are known. However, the process parameters are usually unknown and must be estimated from an in-control Phase-I dataset. This will lead to deterioration in the performance of a control chart. The average run length (ARL) has been implemented as the common performance measure in process monitoring of the SDS chart. Computation of ARL requires practitioners to determine shift size in advance. However, this requirement is too restricted as practitioners may not have the experience to specify the shift size in advance. Thus, the expected average run length (EARL) is introduced to assess the performance of the SDS chart when the shift size is random. In this paper, the SDS chart, with known and estimated process parameters, was evaluated based on EARL and compared with the performance measure, ARL.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references