3 in 1: a simple way to prove that \(e^r\), \(\mathrm{ln}(r)\) and \(\pi^2\) are irrational (Q670728): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3751634 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A proof that $e^m$ is irrational / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Number theory IV: Transcendental numbers. Edited by A. N. Parshin, I. R. Shafarevich and R. V. Gamkrelidze. Transl. from the Russian by Neal Koblitz / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5796106 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A simple proof of the irrationality of \(\pi\) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A simple proof that 𝜋 is irrational / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 19:24, 18 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
3 in 1: a simple way to prove that \(e^r\), \(\mathrm{ln}(r)\) and \(\pi^2\) are irrational
scientific article

    Statements

    3 in 1: a simple way to prove that \(e^r\), \(\mathrm{ln}(r)\) and \(\pi^2\) are irrational (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    20 March 2019
    0 references
    The main result of tis paper is that if \(J_n(z)=z^{n+1}\int _0^1 \frac 1{n!} (t^n(1-t)^n)^{(n)} e^{zt}dt\) does not eventualy vanish then not both \(z\) and \(e^z\) can be Gaussian rationals. The proof makes use the Padé approximation.
    0 references
    irrationality
    0 references
    Pade's approximation
    0 references
    number e
    0 references

    Identifiers