Transfer kernel common spatial patterns for motor imagery brain-computer interface classification (Q1737351): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9871603 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2789950121 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Classification of motor imagery EEG signals with support vector machines and particle swarm optimization / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Graph-Based Semi-Supervised Learning and Spectral Kernel Design / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Improved Bounds for the Nyström Method With Application to Kernel Classification / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 22:17, 18 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Transfer kernel common spatial patterns for motor imagery brain-computer interface classification |
scientific article |
Statements
Transfer kernel common spatial patterns for motor imagery brain-computer interface classification (English)
0 references
27 March 2019
0 references
Summary: Motor-imagery-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) commonly use the common spatial pattern (CSP) as preprocessing step before classification. The CSP method is a supervised algorithm. Therefore a lot of time-consuming training data is needed to build the model. To address this issue, one promising approach is transfer learning, which generalizes a learning model can extract discriminative information from other subjects for target classification task. To this end, we propose a transfer kernel CSP (TKCSP) approach to learn a domain-invariant kernel by directly matching distributions of source subjects and target subjects. The dataset IVa of BCI competition III is used to demonstrate the validity by our proposed methods. In the experiment, we compare the classification performance of the TKCSP against CSP, CSP for subject-to-subject transfer (CSP SJ-to-SJ), regularizing CSP (RCSP), stationary subspace CSP (ssCSP), multitask CSP (mtCSP), and the combined mtCSP and ssCSP (ss + mtCSP) method. The results indicate that the superior mean classification performance of TKCSP can achieve 81.14\%, especially in case of source subjects with fewer number of training samples. Comprehensive experimental evidence on the dataset verifies the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed TKCSP approach over several state-of-the-art methods.
0 references
brain-computer interface
0 references
motor-imagery-based BCIs
0 references
common spatial pattern
0 references
classification
0 references