Characterizing subclasses of cover-incomparability graphs by forbidden subposets (Q2314427): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: 1801.03413 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Cover-incomparability graphs of posets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Cover-incomparability graphs and chordal graphs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Cographs which are cover-incomparability graphs of posets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Cover-incomparability graphs and 2-colored diagrams of posets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the complexity of cover-incomparability graphs of posets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Which distance-hereditary graphs are cover-incomparability graphs? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Which \(k\)-trees are cover-incomparability graphs? / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 00:03, 20 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Characterizing subclasses of cover-incomparability graphs by forbidden subposets
scientific article

    Statements

    Characterizing subclasses of cover-incomparability graphs by forbidden subposets (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    22 July 2019
    0 references
    The cover-incomparability graph of a poset is a graph whose vertex set is the vertex set of the poset and where there is an edge between \(x\) and \(y\) if \(x\) covers \(y\) or \(y\) covers \(x\) or \(x\) and \(y\) are incomparable. The authors consider various statements which have recently been made relating the structure of cover-incomparability graphs to forbidden subposets of the poset. They show that these statements are untrue, the confusion possibly having arisen from confusing two special types of subposet -- the isometric subposets and the weaker notion of \(\prec\)-preserving subposet which has to replace the notion of isometric subposet in the statements. The authors also provide corrected versions of these statements
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    poset
    0 references
    graph
    0 references
    cover-incomparability graph
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references