A comparison of bullwhip effect under various forecasting techniques in supply chains with two retailers (Q2319118): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/796384 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2116342152 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Optimal Policy for a Multi-Product, Dynamic, Nonstationary Inventory Problem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Quantifying the Bullwhip Effect in a Simple Supply Chain: The Impact of Forecasting, Lead Times, and Information / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4488779 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Measure of bullwhip effect in supply chains with autoregressive demand process / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A measure of bullwhip effect in supply chains with a mixed autoregressive-moving average demand process / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 04:39, 20 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A comparison of bullwhip effect under various forecasting techniques in supply chains with two retailers
scientific article

    Statements

    A comparison of bullwhip effect under various forecasting techniques in supply chains with two retailers (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    16 August 2019
    0 references
    Summary: We examine the impact of three forecasting methods on the bullwhip effect in a two-stage supply chain with one supplier and two retailers. A first order mixed autoregressive-moving average model (ARMA(1, 1)) performs the demand forecast and an order-up-to inventory policy characterizes the inventory decision. The bullwhip effect is measured, respectively, under the minimum mean-squared error (MMSE), moving average (MA), and exponential smoothing (ES) forecasting techniques. The effect of parameters on the bullwhip effect under three forecasting methods is analyzed and the bullwhip effect under three forecasting methods is compared. Conclusions indicate that different forecasting methods lead to different bullwhip effects caused by lead time, underlying parameters of the demand process, market competition, and the consistency of demand volatility between two retailers. Moreover, some suggestions are present to help managers to select the forecasting method that yields the lowest bullwhip effect.
    0 references

    Identifiers