Research on overconfidence in decision-making for the capacity recovery of damaged power systems (Q2321425): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/527598 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2012269755 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q59039290 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Supply Disruptions, Asymmetric Information, and a Backup Production Option / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 07:07, 20 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Research on overconfidence in decision-making for the capacity recovery of damaged power systems
scientific article

    Statements

    Research on overconfidence in decision-making for the capacity recovery of damaged power systems (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    23 August 2019
    0 references
    Summary: This paper studies the influence of two types of overconfident behavior, overestimation and overprecision, on decision of capacity recovery when power system's critical capacity is seriously damaged. A newsvendor model is used to prove that increasing regulatory punishment for electricity shortage and providing subsidy for capacity recovery are conducive measures to calibrate insufficient service level caused by an overconfident manager. The research also finds that the manager's overprecision behavior both negatively and positively influences the decision of capacity recovery, and a calibration method could motivate manager to recover more capacity by tuning up the ratio of punishment and subsidy. However, the effectiveness of the calibration mentioned above is inevitably weakened due to the less capacity recovery given by an overestimated manager. This research also indicates that the manager should pay close attention to the random disturbance whose distribution peak is left skewed, and correspondingly more capacity recovery should be given to improve the service level of power system during the disruption.
    0 references

    Identifiers