Complex disk products and Cartesian ovals (Q2329384): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00022-019-0502-2 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2969601075 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bounds for the determinant by Gershgorin circles / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The determinant of a complex matrix and Gershgorin circles / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Minkowski geometric algebra of complex sets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Exact Minkowski products of \(N\) complex disks / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 16:51, 20 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Complex disk products and Cartesian ovals
scientific article

    Statements

    Complex disk products and Cartesian ovals (English)
    0 references
    17 October 2019
    0 references
    The authors [Electron. J. Linear Algebra 35, 181--186 (2019; Zbl 1430.15006)] had shown that the determinant of a complex matrix is contained in the Minkowski product of its Gershgorin circles. In their proof, they showed that the product of two complex disks \(B=D(S,1)\cdot D(1,s)\) with common centre 1 where \(D(1,\delta)=\{z\in\mathbb{C} : |z-1|\le\delta\}\) is contained in another such product \(A=D(R,1)\cdot D(1,r)\) if the radii of the circles satisfy \(R\ge S\ge s\ge r\ge 0\) and \(Rr=Ss\). In this paper, the authors investigate more generally the relationship between \(A\) and \(B\) assuming only that \(R\ge S\ge s\ge r\ge 0\). The case of common centre 1 is sufficient to deal with as other cases can be reduced to this one or the product is a disk. They obtain simple conditions on the position of the left- and right-most real points of \(A\) and \(B\). More precisely, \(A\subseteq B\) if and only if the left-most real point \(\lambda_A=1-R-r|1-R|\) of \(A\) is in \(B\), that is, \(\lambda_A\le \lambda_B\). Similarly, \(B\subseteq A\) if and only if the right-most real point \(\rho_B=(1+S)(1+s)\) of \(B\) is in \(A\), that is, \(\rho_B\le \rho_A\). The proof makes use of a parametrization of the outer loop in the boundary of \(A\) found previously by the authors [loc. cit.]. The authors extend their characterizations to when one of \(A\) or \(B\) is contained in the interior of the other and to more than two products of disks.
    0 references
    complex disk products
    0 references
    Minkowski products
    0 references
    Cartesian ovals
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references