Validation in principal components analysis applied to EEG data (Q2330157): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / describes a project that uses
 
Property / describes a project that uses: R.matlab / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / describes a project that uses
 
Property / describes a project that uses: R / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / describes a project that uses
 
Property / describes a project that uses: e1071 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / describes a project that uses
 
Property / describes a project that uses: pracma / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/413801 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2027768790 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Principal component analysis. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Sensitivity in Metric Scaling and Analysis of Distance / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Which Bootstrap for Principal Axes Methods? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3806595 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5689624 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Estimating the Error Rate of a Prediction Rule: Improvement on Cross-Validation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Application of the Parametric Bootstrap to Models that Incorporate a Singular Value Decomposition / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4171490 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A New Convex Hull Algorithm for Planar Sets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Validity studies in clustering methodologies / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Review of Hierarchical Classification / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Principal component analysis of gait kinematics data in acute and chronic stroke patients / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Influential Observations and Outliers in Regression / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 18:29, 20 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Validation in principal components analysis applied to EEG data
scientific article

    Statements

    Validation in principal components analysis applied to EEG data (English)
    0 references
    21 October 2019
    0 references
    Summary: The well-known multivariate technique principal components analysis (PCA) is usually applied to a sample, and so component scores are subjected to sampling variability. However, few studies address their stability, an important topic when the sample size is small. This work presents three validation procedures applied to PCA, based on confidence regions generated by a variant of a nonparametric bootstrap called the partial bootstrap: (i) the assessment of PC scores variability by the spread and overlapping of ``confidence regions'' plotted around these scores; (ii) the use of the confidence regions centroids as a validation set; and (iii) the definition of the number of nontrivial axes to be retained for analysis. The methods were applied to EEG data collected during a postural control protocol with twenty-four volunteers. Two axes were retained for analysis, with 91.6\% of explained variance. Results showed that the area of the confidence regions provided useful insights on the variability of scores and suggested that some subjects were not distinguishable from others, which was not evident from the principal planes. In addition, potential outliers, initially suggested by an analysis of the first principal plane, could not be confirmed by the confidence regions.
    0 references
    EEG data
    0 references
    principal components analysis
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references