The logical structure of linguistic commitment. I: Four systems of non- relevant commitment entailment (Q1332144): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Pavel Materna / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Pavel Materna / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4085699 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5815602 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3026978 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The logical structure of linguistic commitment. I: Four systems of non- relevant commitment entailment / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3701398 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4073301 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01048687 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W4237633286 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 09:22, 30 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The logical structure of linguistic commitment. I: Four systems of non- relevant commitment entailment
scientific article

    Statements

    The logical structure of linguistic commitment. I: Four systems of non- relevant commitment entailment (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1994
    0 references
    Explicating entailment in terms of commitments, the authors stress the normative character of logical theory. Using natural deduction (Fitch style) and algebraic semantics (Kripke style), they present four axiomatizations of entailment (the only connectives being conjunction and implication) and connect them with particular constraints concerning the degree of embedding of commitments. A ``relevance'' version will be explained in the forthcoming second part of the article.
    0 references
    modal logic
    0 references
    theoremhood
    0 references
    natural deduction
    0 references
    algebraic semantics
    0 references
    axiomatizations of entailment
    0 references
    degree of embedding of commitments
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references