There is no Euclidean self-dual quaternary [18,9,7] code (Q622783): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijicot.2010.032135 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2149284618 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 09:35, 30 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
There is no Euclidean self-dual quaternary [18,9,7] code
scientific article

    Statements

    There is no Euclidean self-dual quaternary [18,9,7] code (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    4 February 2011
    0 references
    Summary: We prove that there is no Euclidean self-dual quaternary [18, 9, 7] code for the Hamming distance. The proof is based on a generalisation of the balance principle to Euclidean self-dual quaternary codes. We prove that the existence of an [18, 9, 7] Euclidean self-dual quaternary code implies the existence of an [11, 3, 7] Euclidean self-orthogonal code, which non-existence is proven. We give an up-to-date table for Euclidean self-dual quaternary codes.
    0 references
    0 references
    quaternary self-dual codes
    0 references
    bounds
    0 references
    Euclidean self-dual codes
    0 references
    Hamming distance
    0 references
    0 references